Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Discuss EC/MC/DC here!

Moderators: Dave Zero1, Don Alexander, Giz, midgetshrimp, Cassandra

Post Reply
User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by Fluffy »

Gotoh wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:10 am
Cortez wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 1:36 am
No way Gaby is straight and she has an obvious crush on Naomi.
Based on...? :-\

Fair point about Naomi: I forgot about the mermaid incident, since we only heard about it.

Well, there was her make out session with Teddi after the Artemis Girls rescued her from the girl jocks. Truth be told, that could be blamed on the pheromones; however, she had been exposed to a minimal dose (when compared to the girl jocks) and wasn't so out of it that she was distracted from her task (looking for signs that would explain Teddy's sudden gender swap).

So, I'd guess Gabrielle is at least bi curious to be comfortable going that far.
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

Gotoh
Posts: 4095
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:18 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by Gotoh »

@Fluffy: She and Tandy said it was due to their exposure to Teddy's pheromones, which is why they were grateful to only get a small dose. Daisy and her friends weren't as fortunate.

thedoctornw
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 5:58 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by thedoctornw »

Awww...I like this ending, and not just for the wordplay. ;) Teddy really did everything he could for Chloe--I like her acknowledging that, and promising to make as much effort to save Teddy if need be. And, of course, I'm glad they got their happily ever after, whatever happens once the collar comes off! In the end, this was Teddy & Chloe's story, and this was a good ending to it.

EmptyHat
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:37 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by EmptyHat »

Congratulations on finishing up the project. I think my favourite parts about it were Naomi and Alchemy as characters and Teddy getting ridiculously caught up in the freedom of being a different interpretation of themself during the infamous 'stripper arc'. I can see why some people felt the need to constantly complain about things but even though they had their reasons I think the fact that this is a fictional story built on a ridiculous premise rather than an instruction guide on ethics means that it all comes down to hot air and the fact that they should really have just walked away. Good luck on future projects and I hope to see some of the cast show up as guests in shared universe stuff.

User avatar
Cortez
Posts: 2419
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:53 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by Cortez »

Fluffy wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 3:52 am

So, I'd guess Gabrielle is at least bi curious to be comfortable going that far.
And she has said as much herself. Honestly, there's no evidence of her being straight.

Gotoh wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:31 am
It must've been, 'cuz I saw nothing that supports it.
Remember how she reacts to the possibility of Naomi being bi curious.


http://www.dangerouslychloe.com/strips- ... the_School

She's clearly Bi.

And she already was attracted to "Teddi" even before being anywhere near her.
EmptyHat wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 4:46 am
I think the fact that this is a fictional story built on a ridiculous premise rather than an instruction guide on ethics means that it all comes down to hot air and the fact that they should really have just walked away.

So any opinion that differs from yours is hot air?
Last edited by Cortez on Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:04 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Gotoh
Posts: 4095
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:18 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by Gotoh »

Cortez wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 5:16 am
Fluffy wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 3:52 am
So, I'd guess Gabrielle is at least bi curious to be comfortable going that far.
And she has said as much herself.
Saw the link above. I'm still not convinced, but I suppose we'll never know for certain either way. :-??

User avatar
Valkog
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:19 am
Contact:

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by Valkog »

Cortez wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 5:16 am
EmptyHat wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 4:46 am
I think the fact that this is a fictional story built on a ridiculous premise rather than an instruction guide on ethics means that it all comes down to hot air and the fact that they should really have just walked away.
So any opinion that differs from yours is hot air?
Yes, that's how you think if you're an exhausting scold who can't handle even the most minor of criticism being aimed at a work of fiction you enjoy.
**== **== **== **==

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by Fluffy »

Valkog wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:23 am
Cortez wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 5:16 am
EmptyHat wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 4:46 am
I think the fact that this is a fictional story built on a ridiculous premise rather than an instruction guide on ethics means that it all comes down to hot air and the fact that they should really have just walked away.
So any opinion that differs from yours is hot air?
Yes, that's how you think if you're an exhausting scold who can't handle even the most minor of criticism being aimed at a work of fiction you enjoy.
Or if you're the kind of person who labels said criticism as hate speech (because they genuinely can't tell the difference between the two) and/or confuse an open discussion forum as a hug box/echo chamber for the writer/artist - and any 'naysayers' are unwelcome.
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

User avatar
Cortez
Posts: 2419
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:53 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by Cortez »

Gotoh wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 5:31 am

Saw the link above. I'm still not convinced, but I suppose we'll never know for certain either way. :-??
Fair enough

leann123
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 5:39 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by leann123 »

This series got worse as it went on and ended with a crap ending just like Menage a 3. I am disappoint considering I spent all these years reading this. I feel the same way as when I read that horrible Naruto ending.

User avatar
Spacedoubt
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:49 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by Spacedoubt »

Hey just wanted to say I really enjoyed this series, there's really nothing else like it. Love you guys and best of luck with your future projects :X

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by Fluffy »

leann123 wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 5:05 pm
This series got worse as it went on and ended with a crap ending just like Menage a 3. I am disappoint considering I spent all these years reading this. I feel the same way as when I read that horrible Naruto ending.
At least Ma3 ended with no loose ends (that I'm aware of, anyway) and was largely enjoyable from beginning to end.

Dangerously Chloe started off promising; but as soon as the Valentine's Day arc concluded (with Chloe deliberately sabotaging Teddy's bonding moment with Triana; a girl Chloe herself tried to hook Teddy up with early on), it went down the crap shoot.
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

User avatar
Vitocap
Posts: 326
Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 5:02 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by Vitocap »

And thus it ends. Just like it started, with all the right messages. Both MA3 and DC. A positive vision of sex, and of all things sexual, and of all characters who freely enjoy their sexuality. Even if they are promiscuous. Even if they are cheaters. Even if they are children. Even if they are demons from hell, lol. Well done. To the very end, Giz and Dave kept on doing their own thing, completely ignoring the fundies and loonies who polluted the forum with their trollery. (I admit it: I laughed heartily at the scene of succubized Abby, right on the sofa with the other girls, watching the live porn stream of her brother and Chloe shagging like minks. Hah.)

And, actually, when I say "ignoring the loonies" I mean it in the old obsolete sense. This is a little tidbit of information that you may not know about: Giz and Dave don't give a flaming rat's ass about the forum. Harsh, but true. Giz and Dave don't read the forum, don't care about the opinions of the people who write here and don't pay attention to their messages, praises or flames. I've had confirmation from Giz herself -- she wrote to me (in reply to a pm) and stated it candidly:

https://image.ibb.co/eMogFV/Giz-message-Clipboard01.jpg

Of course, this also explains why the trolls and haters in the forum had so little success when they tried to pressure the creative team. People like Fluffy or Error of Logic practically spend their lives glued to their screens, posting huge bricks of text to bash the comic and denounce the evils of the authors... and they are systematically ignored, as if they weren't there. Of course, knowing that Giz and Dave have never ever read their messages, this comes as no surprise. I kinda wonder, though: do these little trolls know the truth? How would they feel if they knew they have wasted years of their lives writing here, trying to influence Giz & Dave, for nothing? Oh, the schadenfreude of it all.

This was fun. It was fun while it lasted, and it'll be fun on future rereads. Thank you, Giz and Dave, for your hard work -- for staying true to yourselves all along, and creating real comic masterpieces.
Last edited by Vitocap on Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
We, the old ghosts of Pizen Bluff, who still roam about this dead forum screaming imprecations at the characters and whatnot.

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by Fluffy »

Vitocap wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 7:40 pm
Of course, this also explains why the trolls and haters in the forum had so little success when they tried to pressure the creative team.
No one was pressuring the writing team - ever.

Like you said - they don't read the forums and could give a rat's ass what people said here (this would include the praise, btw - unless you're implying they're only listening to the positive feedback; which is just shameful for a creative person to do if they ever want to grow/evolve in their chosen craft). But, just because the creative team doesn't bother with the forums doesn't mean people are not allowed to criticize what they're reading.

Last time - the forum is not, and never has been a hug box for the creative team. Don't like reading the criticism? - either report it to a mod (if you think it's bad enough to warrant a report) or use the foes list (it's there for the express purpose of ignoring forumites you don't like/agree with).

As for why you're not on my foes list - it's because your hypocrisy/double standards never fail to amuse me.
Last edited by Fluffy on Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

dmra
Posts: 767
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-04-19 The End

Post by dmra »

Vitocap wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 7:40 pm
And thus it ends. Just like it started, with all the right messages. Both MA3 and DC. A positive vision of sex, and of all things sexual, and of all characters who freely enjoy their sexuality. Even if they are promiscuous. Even if they are cheaters. Even if they are children. Even if they are demons from hell, lol.
And yet funnily enough all the people you call trollers and haters are readers of MA3 and perfectly happy with its attitude to sex. So perhaps they aren't quite the "fundies" and "loonies" you think they are but just people with a different opinion to you on one comic strip.

And on a side note have any of your partners cheated on you or has that happened to anybody you care about? Because from what I've seen of when it has happened a joyful positive experience it wasn't and there's a big difference between an open relationship and a dishonest one.

Post Reply