08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Discuss SDB here!

Moderators: Shouri, Giz

User avatar
Spidrift
Posts: 13180
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Spidrift »

Or boobs, even on the narrow definition I'm used to...

We could talk about Dillon clamping his buttocks against Andy's junk ("Look Ma! Indecent assault with No hands!"), but this is getting into areas I'd prefer to leave to lawyers and porn casting directors. I still say it breaks any sane "No Touching" rule, whatever.
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.

User avatar
Optimus Kate
Posts: 532
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 8:56 pm

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Optimus Kate »

Boobs are included in "junk" to me, but since we were talking about a dude I figured they didn't need mention. ;)

Idk, I've rubbed my butt on people while dancing?

User avatar
Spidrift
Posts: 13180
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Spidrift »

It sounds like that "no touching" rule is interestingly flexible. ("Unless it's twerking"?) I won't comment on what you do with people I assume you know, but, umm, I think if you rubbed your butt against me, dancing or not, there's at least one person (beside me) who'd raise loud questions, and I wouldn't blame her.
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.

User avatar
Bambikles
Posts: 1675
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:14 am
Location: France

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Bambikles »

And the Only Sane Man is actually an Only Sane Girl. :D

User avatar
Spidrift
Posts: 13180
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Spidrift »

Only Sane People in this setting have to have a flaw. Jerzy's is crap judgement about people he likes; Ruby's is her hang-ups.

(Jung's is probably excessive detachment; Matt's is primarily risk addiction...)
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.

TheResult
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 4:48 pm

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by TheResult »

"It's okay because I'm in a relationship where we agreed we could do it, and it works out" doesn't actually make it okay. Everybody is different, different people are okay with- or comfortable with- different things, and what they're comfortable with doesn't necessarily make them right or wrong. It either means that you agree with them and there won't be any problems, or you disagree with them and it A) won't work out or B) somebody will have to compromise.

Dillon's problem is that he's a hypocrite. He made a pretty big scene in public on his very first date with Jerzy because Angel was flirting with him, and Dillon was staking a claim. Seriously, Dillon was a jealous ball of rage. The very next day, Dillon is flirting with a guy in a pet shop, and gets mad at Angel when he's called out on it. Yes, Angel was being emotionally manipulative, but Angel being wrong isn't mutually exclusive with Dillon being wrong; they can both be wrong at the same time, and they are. Also, as far as Andy is concerned, even though Dillon wasn't "copping a feel" on Andy, he was lying and manipulating Andy into touching him and getting rubbed on. That was honestly just creepy and awful, Jerzy's approval notwithstanding.

What would make this whole situation right is if Dillon and Jerzy just sat down and talked about what they're both comfortable with. If they just communicated with each other about what they think is appropriate, like a couple should, it wouldn't be an issue. Jerzy might even be okay with Dillon's flirting (despite Dillon being a hypocrite) because Jerzy himself has said that he doesn't mind "a little competition". Dillon should try asking exactly how much competition Jerzy considers "a little".

(Of course, we all know that isn't going to happen because this is a comic and oh boy we sure love our Three's Company misunderstandings. I'm just saying, it's only morally ambiguous until ground rules are laid down.)

User avatar
Optimus Kate
Posts: 532
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 8:56 pm

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Optimus Kate »

Lol I don't rub my butt on strangers, Spidrift, geez. Get your mind out of the gutter. :P

Anyway, as intensely interesting as debating moral ambiguity in a Giz comic is, all I will say is that yes Dillon is a hypocrite but I don't really think, besides that, he's done anything wrong. People are stupid and often make confusing, dumb, sometimes hypocritical judgment calls, or react a certain way that doesn't make sense. That's why it's a situational comedy. It's supposed to be about people getting into dumb stuff through their own faults and means.

Then again, I think I'm like the polar opposite of most of you guys here. I love Dillon but Ruby kind of grates me. So, yeah, it's okay to ignore everything I say. Lol

User avatar
Spidrift
Posts: 13180
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Spidrift »

It's probably mostly a question of who you can identify with.

My problem with Dillon isn't so much that he's a hypocrite; it's that he's vaguely aware of his faults, and he thinks they make him cute. There's very little more annoying than someone who thinks he's cute but isn't, especially if he uses it as an excuse for being a jerk.

Though obviously, if you do find him cute, all bets are off.
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.

User avatar
Bambikles
Posts: 1675
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:14 am
Location: France

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Bambikles »

Spidrift wrote:Only Sane People in this setting have to have a flaw. Jerzy's is crap judgement about people he likes; Ruby's is her hang-ups.

(Jung's is probably excessive detachment; Matt's is primarily risk addiction...)
Was talking about Kate. :p

User avatar
Spidrift
Posts: 13180
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Spidrift »

Flaw: Flirting with half the people on this group. (Put them down, you don't know where they've been.) Or maybe a touch of the Mileys...
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.

User avatar
Optimus Kate
Posts: 532
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 8:56 pm

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Optimus Kate »

If that's my flaw, I sure hope it's a tragic one!

*kisses everyone until she dies*

Oh no I was riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggghhhhhhhhhttttttt... 8-X

User avatar
Don Alexander
Dr. Ebil SithMod
Posts: 28238
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:26 am
Location: Under the arms of the ancient oak, where daylight hangs by a lunar noose...

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Don Alexander »

Optimus Kate wrote:Lol I don't rub my butt on strangers, Spidrift, geez. Get your mind out of the gutter. :P
What am I EVEN DOING HERE??? [-(

:P

I guess I meet you halfway, I hate Dillon but find Ruby to be annoying as well. ;)

And Bambikles, thanks for grouping me in the insane majority! :))
ImageImage
Sithlord of the Sithling and best customer of McLovecraft's Image, in the business of keeping the little Platypus in business
Moderations in GREEN and signed by the DAMNed. I am not anonymous! Also, MODSMACK!! Image
Winner of the... 2010 Kilopost FRANKIE; 2010 Mad March Nom Off; 2010 Joker Cleavage Contest; 2010 Fan-Thing Contest; 2010 Mimic Contest (tied); 2011 Joker Cleavage Contest; 2011 Contest-for-the-next-Contest (tied)

User avatar
Azrael
Mischief Maker
Posts: 24100
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:48 am
Location: Down below, where the dead men go

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Azrael »

Spidrift wrote:
Don Alexander wrote:By the way, I looked up the pet shop chapter and noticed that both Dillon and Jacob kept referring to Angel as a guy. ("Mister" and "Mr. Emo"...)
Yes - everybody does who doesn't know him well. Jerzy, however, doesn't.

And so far, neither do Zii nor Yuki.
Grand Low Maker of Mischief, Claw of Chaos, Fang of Anarchy

politics: n. pl. from the Grk polis, meaning many, and the OE ticia, meaning blood sucking insects.

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Fluffy »

Spidrift wrote:It's probably mostly a question of who you can identify with.

My problem with Dillon isn't so much that he's a hypocrite; it's that he's vaguely aware of his faults, and he thinks they make him cute. There's very little more annoying than someone who thinks he's cute but isn't, especially if he uses it as an excuse for being a jerk.

Though obviously, if you do find him cute, all bets are off.
I used to think that Dillon was cute - that is, until he started interfering in Amber's love life (preventing her from seeing Gary by reminding her that he has feeling for him).

I can understand this when they were both single (it would be some variation of the Girl Code - you don't date a guy that your BFF has a crush on). But not only was he going back on his word when he said Amber could see Gary (tricked into it or not), but seeing as Dillon is with Jerzy at this point in time, he has no business preventing Amber from making her claim on Gary (but , we all know he will, anyway; because Dillon is a greedy bitch).
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

User avatar
Spidrift
Posts: 13180
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm

Re: 08-04-14 Threw quite the tantrum

Post by Spidrift »

All that is certainly unattractive, but it could just make him a good comedy character - comedy being about imperfect people and all that. It's the sense that he, and maybe even the writers, think it actually makes him somehow sweet that causes me to grind my teeth a bit.
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.

Post Reply