Uh, no. That's a moral judgement, not a matter of knowledge. She always knew exactly what Amber did (and indeed that was where the trouble started). It's what she thinks about it that causes trouble.brasca wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:36 amI'm referring to her relationship with Amber. Her animosity towards her was willful ignorance. Ruby chooses to think she's depraved, but I think she knows better. Yes, Amber has a bit more of sexual appetite than the average person, but Ruby realizes now that there's nothing wrong with wanting sex.
You can certainly call her judgmental, and with her broadened horizons you might now say that her thinking is a little muddled, but she's never been ignorant.
Well, he's certainly a lot less sex-obsessed than Gary ever was, sure. You can say that makes him kind of asexual, at least for the moment, if you like. But as I understand it, a real asexual isn't attracted at all to either sex. Andy is clearly attracted to Ruby at some level -- he likes the idea of dating her, he apparently enjoys kissing her, and the idea of sex as a favour to her didn't throw him at all badly -- whereas his interest in men seems to be truly zero. He seems to have a low sex drive, but it doesn't seem to be entirely absent.brasca wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:36 amOkay so he's had even less action than I imagined... and yet he's not complaining about it. It's even more compelling evidence that he's asexual since he doesn't seem to mind that he's only been on one date and it was his cousin. Gary on the other hand was clueless about his lack of success with women and wanted to do something about it.
How low it'll remain once he starts actually having sex remains to be seen. If his reaction is "meh, that was okay, I hope that you enjoyed it", sure, I'll grant you that he's approaching asexuality (though not getting there). If, on the other hand, it's more like "gosh, thanks, that was a really good idea", I'll classify him as merely a late starter. And being a late starter isn't the same as being asexual; if it was, you'd have to call Ruby asexual -- which would make the word pretty meaningless.
(Plus, comedy. Making a character asexual would kind of drain scenes of humour in the context of these comics. Making them clueless, or giving them weird systems of morality, is an unending source of jokes.)