21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Discuss Ma3 here!

Moderators: Dave Zero1, Don Alexander, Giz, midgetshrimp

samtheman
Posts: 640
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:59 pm

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by samtheman »

And when Tracy is about to go down on Gary someone's cell phone will go off or the apartment's doorbell will start ringing.

User avatar
Vitocap
Posts: 326
Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 5:02 am

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by Vitocap »

I really don't understand how James is supposed to be a good lover.

For what we have seen, he and Tracy have great sex and James is able to fully satisfy her.

For what we are finding just now, he's the sort of guy who would stop to ask permission before every touch or caress (because otherwise it's not sex, it's rape).

Something doesn't add up here...
We, the old ghosts of Pizen Bluff, who still roam about this dead forum screaming imprecations at the characters and whatnot.

JackApostrophe
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 12:17 pm

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by JackApostrophe »

How did Tracy never use this argument strategy to get James to demand she give him a BJ?

Continuity
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 8:06 am

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by Continuity »

This is a bit surreal - is it possible that Tracy and James are just trolling Gary, somehow?

User avatar
UnsightlyWalrus
Posts: 165
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 9:58 am

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by UnsightlyWalrus »

I didn't understand a word what James was saying.

I mean, I get what he's trying to say but the word salad he uses is indigestible. :P

BlairFan
Yap Yap Sycophant
Posts: 7788
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by BlairFan »

James can't help mansplaining, it's what guys do. ;)

suranae
Posts: 472
Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 2:31 am

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by suranae »

Mansplaining is a stupid term

Fairy Glade's Fairy
BANNED
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 10:30 pm

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by Fairy Glade's Fairy »

lol I wonder if he and Tracy ever had real intercourse?
I bet James refuses PIV sex and asks for armpit sex instead :))

User avatar
Cortez
Posts: 2419
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:53 am

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by Cortez »

Mackus wrote:
Sat Oct 21, 2017 10:15 am
Obnoxious white knight ends up insisting on being cucked.
It's not really cucking if it's a threesome though.

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by Fluffy »

If Tracy blows him, may Gary give her a swirly go round that blows her mind to the point that she dumps James as a result. :ymdevil:
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

BlairFan
Yap Yap Sycophant
Posts: 7788
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by BlairFan »

Fluffy, that was naughty!
(Please keep posting.) :ymdevil:

User avatar
Spidrift
Posts: 13180
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by Spidrift »

sukebe senpai wrote:
Sat Oct 21, 2017 2:35 pm
White male who poses as a feminist when he doesn't even understand the most basic aspects of feminism, let alone the post-modern, bourgeois buzzwords he throws around, fails epically.
Traditionally, males who pose with half-understood feminist jargon do it in order to get laid. But James can clearly do that much better when he stops trying to be feminist. And honestly, “sacred space”? He talked bollocks before, but at least it wasn’t painful New Age bollocks...

Okay, we already knew that he was a one-dimensional caricature. (Though on his first appearance, he was notable for being properly, seductively eloquent.) And talking of dimensions, Gary appears to have shrunk to half size in panel 2. He’s visibly standing in front of Tracy, but he only comes up to her shoulder. Or perhaps the real Gary has wisely run away and left a ventriloquist’s dummy on Tracy’s lap to cover his absence.
JackApostrophe wrote:
Sat Oct 21, 2017 6:11 pm
How did Tracy never use this argument strategy to get James to demand she give him a BJ?
The Roger Rabbit principle.
Fairy Glade's Fairy wrote:
Sat Oct 21, 2017 8:06 pm
I wonder if he and Tracy ever had real intercourse?
Their first encounter looked quite real to me. And, because James was a sane character back then, he was clearly capable of enjoying it without any weird hang-ups.

He’s been flanderised really, really fast.
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.

User avatar
LegendaryKroc
Posts: 890
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:22 am
Location: In the Hall of the Mountain King

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by LegendaryKroc »

Spidrift wrote:
Sat Oct 21, 2017 10:39 pm
The Roger Rabbit principle.
Demonstrated thusly:

Eddie Valiant: You mean you could've taken your hand out of that cuff at any time?!

Roger Rabbit: No, not at any time, only when it was funny!

On TV Tropes, we call that the Rule of Funny. You folks have probably seen me mention it a few times.

JoybuzzerX
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:02 am

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by JoybuzzerX »

Wow. I hate James even more now :p
someone wrote:
Sat Oct 21, 2017 4:51 pm
I like Tracy; she's the only one who uses her brains to get what she wants.
If she used her brains, she would've left James a long time ago. :p

suranae
Posts: 472
Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 2:31 am

Re: 21-10-17 Sacred womanspace

Post by suranae »

If Tracy used her brains she would have tried a variant of this ploy earlier w/o Gary.

Post Reply