30-09-17 I can destroy him
Moderators: Dave Zero1, Don Alexander, Giz, midgetshrimp
- sparky
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:09 am
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
Solution: Ask if his "girlfriend" Peggy can come along so she can do the butt stuff and somehow have it where he is unaware of it being her while "Gary", aka "Tracy" does the oral stuff. Not a lot in there for Gary but at least he isn't doing anything he doesn't want to do and the women are enjoying themselves doing what they like to do. James probably wouldn't balk at a foursome if this ultimatum was okay with him. Maybe he can do Peggy while she's pegging James or something like that.
- Error of Logic
- Posts: 5862
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 6:43 pm
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
And that would arguably be assault with intent to harm, and go well beyond the limits of the acceptable.sukebe senpai wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:14 amThe only chance that Gary may actually have to get out of this situation is to do the butt-wrecking first, and to do it in such a way that James will not want to go near Gary for the next few centuries. Perhaps fisting would be viable. With a little sand added to the Crisco.
-
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 8:48 am
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
Sorry, there was some miscommunication. I didn't mean that he has moral objection to getting his butt-rammed, but rather the whole "threesome" was brought up because his supposed "respect for women" prevents him from receiving certain favours his girlfriend is both willing and eager to provide, thus he asks for a third party/proverbial butt monkey.Spidrift wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2017 11:17 amI don't get the impression he has a moral objection to anal sex here; he just feels defensive of his arse's tenderness. Hey, I can relate.OllieOrOlly wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2017 10:39 amAt least stupid James' curiosity to experiment being hampered by some weird sanctimony has stayed consistent? Aha...
Monastery of eunuchs maybe safer bet?sukebe senpai wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:18 amWhat makes you think his butt would be safe in a monastery?
Double post merged. The DAMNed
- Error of Logic
- Posts: 5862
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 6:43 pm
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
Not really. Not to an inventive and sufficiently interested party.
- Spidrift
- Posts: 13180
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
Do you mean, do I think that monasteries are hotbeds of male-on-male rape? No, not particularly. I think that they're quiet places full of people who have at least nominally eschewed sex. Which many characters in this comic could probably use as a temporary option from time to time.sukebe senpai wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:18 amWhat makes you think his butt would be safe in a monastery?
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.
-
- BANNED
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 10:30 pm
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
Dillon's bf was like that too, and look at him now
James right now is transitioning from bi to gay, just like that guy did
- Spidrift
- Posts: 13180
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
Well, Jerzy's complete transition would be more convincing if he didn't keep screwing someone who he knew as female for many years and literally still sees as female some of the time. And if he hadn't screwed Zii within the last year or two.
And if you're going to define him as "gay" because he says so, you can't define him as Dillon's boyfriend, because he says not. A true Master of Denial, is Jerzy.
(A better example might be Sonya's ex Jake, actually. Though he was still deep in denial when last seen - and he too has done far too much hetero stuff in the recent past for me to use any other word than "bi".)
And if you're going to define him as "gay" because he says so, you can't define him as Dillon's boyfriend, because he says not. A true Master of Denial, is Jerzy.
(A better example might be Sonya's ex Jake, actually. Though he was still deep in denial when last seen - and he too has done far too much hetero stuff in the recent past for me to use any other word than "bi".)
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:25 am
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
You haven't heard of Mt. Athos in Greece, then.Spidrift wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:53 amDo you mean, do I think that monasteries are hotbeds of male-on-male rape? No, not particularly. I think that they're quiet places full of people who have at least nominally eschewed sex. Which many characters in this comic could probably use as a temporary option from time to time.sukebe senpai wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:18 amWhat makes you think his butt would be safe in a monastery?
Well, he did say "destroy"... And harm - intentional or not - isn't below what Ma3 characters can or will do.Error of Logic wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2017 5:29 amAnd that would arguably be assault with intent to harm, and go well beyond the limits of the acceptable.sukebe senpai wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:14 amThe only chance that Gary may actually have to get out of this situation is to do the butt-wrecking first, and to do it in such a way that James will not want to go near Gary for the next few centuries. Perhaps fisting would be viable. With a little sand added to the Crisco.
Double post merged. The DAMNed
FIRRIB
- Error of Logic
- Posts: 5862
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 6:43 pm
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
But not sexual harm. The characters have punched and kicked and flipped and traumatised each other, but no one has pushed anyone else down, ripped off their underwear and endeavoured to cause them pain while they got their rocks off.
- Spidrift
- Posts: 13180
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
Well, only in trivial and consensual amounts...
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.
-
- BANNED
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 10:30 pm
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
I'm not getting you, you say 'if you're going to define him as "gay" because he says so', why the 'if' conditional? I need to define him and debate his gayness cause it's not for certain he's gay, that's your meaning?
- Spidrift
- Posts: 13180
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
Well, it isn’t clear to me that he’s gay rather than bi, by any sensible definition. But my point is, if the rule is that people can always determine what descriptions apply to themselves, then that rule should be applied consistently. So if you’re defining Jerzy as “gay” because he says so, then you probably can’t define him as Dillon’s boyfriend, because he terminated that state.
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:25 am
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
With the exception of Yuki, I guess you're right. But there's a first time for everything. I wonder, however, if ending up in the hospital with a prolapse would cause James to shake his obsession with Gary. Or, if we want to be more exact (although this is a case of what Umberto Eco defines as the "slandered village idiot", i.e. a character who doesn't know and can't know what we, the readers, know), Gary's grapefruit.Error of Logic wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2017 6:02 pmBut not sexual harm. The characters have punched and kicked and flipped and traumatised each other, but no one has pushed anyone else down, ripped off their underwear and endeavoured to cause them pain while they got their rocks off.
FIRRIB
- Spidrift
- Posts: 13180
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
Actually, Yuki has never seemed to get a sexual thrill from inflicting violence. In fact, her violence is her reaction to feeling sexually threatened. She does get off on receiving a bit of fairly mild bondage and spanking, but that’s just a quite trivial level of kink, especially by Ma3 standards.
The character who gets off most on that kind of thing seems to be Zii (surprise surprise), who wouldn’t let that stripper stop spanking her - but even that was just fairly light open-hand stuff. The Ma3 character who arguably comes closest to getting off on inflicting pain would actually be Peggy, with her pegging fetish - but she seems to keep well on the right side of the line with regard to consent. (Translation; she’s found Mr. Consent-To-Anything.) Then there’s Tatiana in SotR, but she’s just a comedy sadist - and actually, her real aim seems to be to get the other person to consent, as abjectly as possible.
The character who gets off most on that kind of thing seems to be Zii (surprise surprise), who wouldn’t let that stripper stop spanking her - but even that was just fairly light open-hand stuff. The Ma3 character who arguably comes closest to getting off on inflicting pain would actually be Peggy, with her pegging fetish - but she seems to keep well on the right side of the line with regard to consent. (Translation; she’s found Mr. Consent-To-Anything.) Then there’s Tatiana in SotR, but she’s just a comedy sadist - and actually, her real aim seems to be to get the other person to consent, as abjectly as possible.
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.
-
- BANNED
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 10:30 pm
Re: 30-09-17 I can destroy him
Lol nah you're wrong, that would be Matt who got so turned on by Yuki's crazy violent sexxor (tearing out all his hair, bruising him all over) he demanded another round
I guess Sonya & Yuki herself are top candidates too, since their lovemaking mixed with savage violence against each other was so good for them.....
Cool but I'm not 'defining Jerzy as “gay” because he says so' I'm defining him as gay cause everyone and their uncle says so, including the one female who sleeps with him, Angel, who needs to use a special set of techniques to please him which are specially designed to allow women to fuck gay men and satisfy them...
I guess they're really kinky techniques too since, when Angel explained them to nerd girl, it fried her childish brain...