25-02-16 Straight-up honest answer

[Giz]

New strip! http://www.ma3comic.com/strips-ma3/stra ... est_answer

[Archangle]

The correct answer is "No". He'd like to say "Yes", but he'd never actually work up the courage to do so.

[Gil Hamilton]

Note that she didn't offer him a BJ there, she asked if she did offer him a BJ, that he'd say yes. A blowjob is not in Gary's future here, what is going to happen is that she's using him for emotional support because she offered her boyfriend one and he declined, and it hurt her feelings.

[Hogan]

... yes?

... I looked up "no" in this context, and it had nothing to do there...

[Spidrift]

Ah, so the problem is James' fastidiousness, probably, after all. Maybe a bit of a repeated joke if so.

Anyway, it seems that now a physical relationship with Zii may just possibly be somewhere in Gary's future, maybe, he's run into a woman who's even more enthusiastically open about sex, but who's even less likely to think of having sex with him. Just to ensure that his frustration level remains high.

And one might think that Tracy is prone to throwing Too Much Information Gary's way, but one must bear in mind the circumstances of their first meeting. It must be hard for her to think about boundaries with him after that.

Also, Gary's last line there might just be the first hint of his supposed religious upbringing since he mentioned it.

[Gil Hamilton]

God *makes himself comfortable and undoes the belt on his robe*: "Say 'yes', Gary, I want to witness this."

Little does Gary know that God doesn't get off to watching people have sex, but watching circumstances collude to prevent sex.

[Dr. Jamming]

All I can think is "Why is this a question?" on so many levels...

[MeinosKaen]

...

I'll just leave this here.

[Don Alexander]

No chance, Gary, God is always there, watching you getting sucked off!

Anyway, you did not answer the lady's question.

A non-Gary (i.e., almost every male) would have likely answered: " Are you kidding? Is that a rhetorical question? Some trap?"

[Spidrift]

It's not rhetorical; on the contrary, it's hypothetical. A sensible male pays close attention to syntax in situations like this.

If they ever arise, that is.

[Raamyah]

Gary, whenever a goddess offers you a blow job, you say YES!

[Milnoc]

Gary! Repeat this in her ear! Quick!

"That would depend on the stage of our relationship. If we were a couple, you wouldn't need to ask, and I would return the favour."

Of course, Gary being Gary, he'd probably say "Oh my! This sandwich made a mess on the table!"

[Dr. Jamming]

Gary hasn't really had a problem with accepting sex when it's offered though... II feel like the hypothetical nature of the question is what will trip him up. If Tracy had just offered fellatio, his answer would have been nearly automatic.

[worldshaking00]

Gary! Repeat this in her ear! Quick!

"That would depend on the stage of our relationship. If we were a couple, you wouldn't need to ask, and I would return the favour."

+1 this. Couldn't have said it better myself. Honest, open, and full of sincerity & affection. And it would fit Gary's personality... maybe with a few stutters and blushing involved though and especially so close to a sex bomb like Tracy.

And that might be all the context Tracy needs with... whomever (James, more than likely). Maybe drawing a parallel with Tracy not understanding why <insert male name> would want a BJ to Tracy's misconceptions with her last relationship fiasco with James. I can see why some guys might be turned off by a BJ, especially certain painful-looking & uber-sloppy versions. But the idea of a <presumably> promiscuous guy not wanting to get pleasured by a hot goddess like Tracy, well, is where I need to put on my "Suspend Disbelief" (tm) hat.

Although, I can empathize with @Don referencing her question to Gary as a trap. Admiral Ackbar would approve. Ditto with @Raamyah's post; lmao to the Ghostbuster's reference.

[brasca]

God *makes himself comfortable and undoes the belt on his robe*: "Say 'yes', Gary, I want to witness this."

Little does Gary know that God doesn't get off to watching people have sex, but watching circumstances collude to prevent sex.

That sounds more like Satan. Cockblocking is more of God's thing, but I don't think Charity or Prudence are needed to ruin Gary's chances. That would just be overkill.

While the answer might be obvious I doubt the consequences will be all that good.