Dangerously Chloe 4-10-18 You Never Called

Discuss EC/MC/DC here!

Moderators: Dave Zero1, Don Alexander, Giz, midgetshrimp, Cassandra

OllieOrOlly
Posts: 571
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 8:48 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 4-10-18 You Never Called

Post by OllieOrOlly » Fri Oct 05, 2018 3:54 am

lordoffiling wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 12:54 am
Fluffy wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 12:05 am
[quote=lordoffiling post_id=600262 time=<a href="tel:1538694764">1538694764</a> user_id=6810]
We’re seeing an evil Teddy here. Evil characters are allowed to do evil things in a work of fiction.
Thing is, Teddy was doing this crap long before this point.
True, but that’s allowed in fiction also. The good guy can make a mistake, or maybe it isn’t a mistake and the good guy can be not so good anymore, he may stumble, he may fall, character growth can go all sorts of directions. It doesn’t always have to be a straight line from good guy to better guy.

EDIT: Tried to fix that nested quote but it refuses, my apologies.
[/quote]

Your point is valid, unfortunately doesn't apply to Teddy/i/y because he hasn't grown in the sense of improvement. He's physically and metaphysically changed, and has changed into a wretched person; arguably worse is that his *journey* has been boring, and not so much a line as a circle. Although, as a baseline: he was good/neutral with a bit of stubbornness problem - changed into a bad entity growing arrogance and worse stubbornness; after doing the same nonsense repeatedly (seems unlikely, but maybe credit is due, "definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting something different." Teddi is insane?), him/her feeling bad after Abby got cross with them doesn't quite mean they are "redeemed."

On a tangent, I'd like to note if anyone happens to like the strip, my dislike for the state of the comic is for the comic only; even if I don't understand why someone would like it as it is, I mean no disrespect.

OllieOrOlly
Posts: 571
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 8:48 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 4-10-18 You Never Called

Post by OllieOrOlly » Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:15 am

I've probably worn out or never had a welcome on this update, though just as a by the way, I realise the irony of my use of the "insanity" quote when I have been criticising really similar problems with the comic almost every time.
*Cue clip of Sideshow Bob demanding the end of television while appearing on a giant TV*

User avatar
brasca
Posts: 3392
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:04 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 4-10-18 You Never Called

Post by brasca » Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:35 am

MissMadness wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 3:36 am
Okay I'm going to ignore the rant of the week going on.

On topic, I don't think Teddy is an incubus, he's a minor demonic sex god. Which might be a bit more problematic since unlike before it seems like he really can't control it and unconsciously (if the inverted eyes are any indication) going after the dudes he slept with as Teddi. Like as Teddi there was the pheremone thing going on with the bullies but this is different way different.

Oh yeah sidenote. If normal Succubi can be bisexual there isn't anything stopping a normal incubi from being the same way at least in this universee.
Good points and it should also be noted that Teddy only has succubi wings, but no tail or horns.

blood_and_cocopops
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:29 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 4-10-18 You Never Called

Post by blood_and_cocopops » Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:45 am

Fluffy wrote:
Thu Oct 04, 2018 10:54 pm
JoybuzzerX wrote:
Thu Oct 04, 2018 7:57 am
Hmmm...he forcibly grabbed a guy who said he wasn't gay, then continued to forcibly kiss him, which lead to sex. Is that considered proper fanservice?
Sure - if you're into sexual assault.

Remember - it's not rape if they don't fight it/ended up liking it. /sarcasm x infinity!
Let's not throw around the 'R' word. Other than a slightly forcefull suprise kiss theres nothing to say Chris wasn't fully consenting to it as it all happened off pannel. It could be that after the kiss Chris jumped Teddy and he instigated it for all we know.

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3363
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 4-10-18 You Never Called

Post by Fluffy » Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:49 am

OllieOrOlly wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 3:54 am
On a tangent, I'd like to note if anyone happens to like the strip, my dislike for the state of the comic is for the comic only; even if I don't understand why someone would like it as it is, I mean no disrespect.
You're stating your opinion on a comic - just like everyone else. If people who love the comic take offense to your criticism, that's on them, not you. You have no reason to humble yourself.
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

User avatar
lordoffiling
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 6:48 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 4-10-18 You Never Called

Post by lordoffiling » Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:26 am

MissMadness wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 3:36 am
Oh yeah sidenote. If normal Succubi can be bisexual there isn't anything stopping a normal incubi from being the same way at least in this universee.
Succubi and incubi need to be pansexual. Comes with the job.
"Rather than simply enjoying these comics, we log in to these forums to argue about them. [...] We are some strange people, and I guess we have nothing better to do." - lordoffiling

User avatar
vampire hunter D
Posts: 3975
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:19 pm
Location: Jasoom

Re: Dangerously Chloe 4-10-18 You Never Called

Post by vampire hunter D » Fri Oct 05, 2018 11:33 am

Huh, Pansexuals...I don't get them. What can anyone find attractive about cookware?
Pointless arguing is one of the three pillars upon which the Internet is built. The other two are of course cat pictures and porn.

User avatar
lordoffiling
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 6:48 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 4-10-18 You Never Called

Post by lordoffiling » Fri Oct 05, 2018 2:18 pm

You laugh, but the man or woman who loves their skillet may indeed exist.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_sexuality
"Rather than simply enjoying these comics, we log in to these forums to argue about them. [...] We are some strange people, and I guess we have nothing better to do." - lordoffiling

Prydonian
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 10:55 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 4-10-18 You Never Called

Post by Prydonian » Sat Oct 06, 2018 8:13 am

Apparently it’s not offensive to imply that straight guys just haven’t had good enough gay sex yet. How odd.

dmra
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 4-10-18 You Never Called

Post by dmra » Sat Oct 06, 2018 4:50 pm

The attitude gets it's mirror with women too in these comics.On this occasion without the "forceful surprise kiss" http://www.dangerouslychloe.com/strips- ... utton_This

The humour is pretty obvious but interestingly I somehow can't see it happening with a gay man or woman suddenly being convinced of the joys of being straight.

User avatar
Cortez
Posts: 2210
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:53 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 4-10-18 You Never Called

Post by Cortez » Sat Oct 06, 2018 10:42 pm

Prydonian wrote:
Sat Oct 06, 2018 8:13 am
Apparently it’s not offensive to imply that straight guys just haven’t had good enough gay sex yet. How odd.
Because it's far more common for a gay man to be told he "hasn't met the right girl".

Post Reply