Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Discuss EC/MC/DC here!

Moderators: Dave Zero1, Don Alexander, Giz, midgetshrimp, Cassandra

Passing Through
Posts: 1313
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by Passing Through » Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:40 am

I feel like Teddi and Pandora were wasting their time with the angel blood. I mean, if the weird frankenboy they've created simply rejects Chloe, what was the point?
capicoli wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 2:23 am
Charity really deserves an MVP award. I'm not use to characters being this competent.
Pandora was plenty competent. I miss her. :(

User avatar
Error of Logic
Posts: 5650
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by Error of Logic » Thu Sep 06, 2018 12:02 pm

Fluffy wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:06 am
Error of Logic wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:02 am

Right now, delay isn't such a bad thing. The characters need to regroup and plan. Not to mention figure out whether Teddy and Chloe are compatible before she does something… permanent.
I can understand this reasoning behind this; but, I'm not looking forward to seeing what it entails. Like, does this mean we should expect a repeat of Teddy's sexual escapades; only this time, as a male slamming countless females to see how long he can last before being spent ? (oh joy! so looking forward to 'that' arc! 8-| )
I was thinking more of a stress test, to see how much damage he can endure. ^^;

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3301
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by Fluffy » Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:06 pm

Error of Logic wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 12:02 pm
I was thinking more of a stress test, to see how much damage he can endure. ^^;
Considering what Teddy is expected to do in order to save Chloe's life - you know sex is going to be involved to a major degree. There's no avoiding it.
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

User avatar
brasca
Posts: 3341
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:04 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by brasca » Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:51 pm

vampire hunter D wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:05 am
And now Naomi and Pru will show up and call Teddy an adulterer
That would be funny, but inaccurate since Prudence knows about their pact and views it as a marriage.

User avatar
Error of Logic
Posts: 5650
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by Error of Logic » Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:56 pm

Fluffy wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:06 pm
Error of Logic wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 12:02 pm
I was thinking more of a stress test, to see how much damage he can endure. ^^;
Considering what Teddy is expected to do in order to save Chloe's life - you know sex is going to be involved to a major degree. There's no avoiding it.
I know. But the issue is not whether he'll do it.
The issue is whether he'll survive.

User avatar
FuzzyFace
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:39 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by FuzzyFace » Thu Sep 06, 2018 4:01 pm

Charity seems to know so much... maybe she has some idea of how developed his godhead needs to be before he can survive this?

Will somebody think to ask?

User avatar
vampire hunter D
Posts: 3949
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:19 pm
Location: Jasoom

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by vampire hunter D » Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:41 pm

brasca wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:51 pm
vampire hunter D wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:05 am
And now Naomi and Pru will show up and call Teddy an adulterer
That would be funny, but inaccurate since Prudence knows about their pact and views it as a marriage.
and that would stop her from misusing the word in what way?
Pointless arguing is one of the three pillars upon which the Internet is built. The other two are of course cat pictures and porn.

meps98
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2013 3:40 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by meps98 » Thu Sep 06, 2018 8:20 pm

It isn't just a question of Teddy's survival but the survival of the general population. Teddy's developing godly attributes are currently being restrained by a heavenly divinity "force field" powered by Charity. Can she keep the field in place should Teddy and Chloe attempt to solve her virginity issue? If not, Teddy and a lot of others go BOOM. If Teddy can't control his current powers, whatever they are, Chloe might also go BOOM. There are many questions to be answered before Teddy and Chloe can risk getting together.

Ophidiophile
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat May 11, 2013 2:15 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by Ophidiophile » Thu Sep 06, 2018 8:37 pm

Bwah-hah-hah-ha. Charity bonked a succubus.

Gotoh
Posts: 3907
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:18 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by Gotoh » Thu Sep 06, 2018 9:00 pm

What I'd like to know is, if deflowering virgin succubi is such a big issue that it requires all these prerequisites and precautions, why are we just now hearing about it?

Choe and Pandora's "talk" with Abby only said the first couple of guys that bone them would be at risk. Now, the threat is to the general public (i.e. the mini "big bangs"). If it takes a being like Teddy to deflower a succubus, why are there no records of events similar to what's taking place?

User avatar
Error of Logic
Posts: 5650
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by Error of Logic » Thu Sep 06, 2018 9:40 pm

Probably the other men who fetched up against a virgin succubus were plain vanilla mortals, were not 'blessed' with people who could warn and prepare them, and so wound up in the ranks of mysterious deaths and disappearances.

User avatar
FuzzyFace
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:39 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by FuzzyFace » Fri Sep 07, 2018 12:40 am

Gotoh wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 9:00 pm
What I'd like to know is, if deflowering virgin succubi is such a big issue that it requires all these prerequisites and precautions, why are we just now hearing about it?

Choe and Pandora's "talk" with Abby only said the first couple of guys that bone them would be at risk. Now, the threat is to the general public (i.e. the mini "big bangs"). If it takes a being like Teddy to deflower a succubus, why are there no records of events similar to what's taking place?
Might just be some confusion over assumptions.

1. We've been told for pages and pages that deflowering a virgin succubus is generally fatal for human males. There's nothing new, there.
2. There seems to be a real danger to everyone nearby as a result of Teddy's apotheosis, which Charity appears to be blocking.
3. Some have now speculated that if Teddy were to try to take advantage of his new status, it could trigger the explosion that Charity has stopped. That's a new situation which only exists so far on the forum.

Gotoh
Posts: 3907
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:18 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by Gotoh » Fri Sep 07, 2018 1:27 am

Error of Logic wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 9:40 pm
Probably the other men who fetched up against a virgin succubus were plain vanilla mortals, were not 'blessed' with people who could warn and prepare them, and so wound up in the ranks of mysterious deaths and disappearances.
Dead people still end up on the news, or the obituary, even if the victims die under mysterious circumstances. Though, in succubi related incidents, you'd think the cause of death would be attributed 'wild animal attack' or something.

I'm not being contrarian, it's just one of those things that makes me wonder how the existence of cryptids, magic users, etc. has remained a secret from the public all this time, despite events like this one and the invasion of Montreal.
FuzzyFace wrote:
Fri Sep 07, 2018 12:40 am
Might just be some confusion over assumptions.

3. Some have now speculated that if Teddy were to try to take advantage of his new status, it could trigger the explosion that Charity has stopped. That's a new situation which only exists so far on the forum.
This is the part I don't get. An angel, demon, or an extraordinarily resilient human male would have sufficed to deflower Chloe. So why did Teddy need to become a god? We've gone from the male victim might die, to untold thousands might die.

Instead of solving the problem, it's created a bigger one.

Varanus
Posts: 1108
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:23 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by Varanus » Fri Sep 07, 2018 2:27 am

Well to be fair, Teddy didn't know he was going to become a god. He just thought he'd gain the angel durability.

"We're both so young" was a really odd thing to say though, given how much sex he's already had (albeit in another form) and that he knows Chloe needs to do this to live.

User avatar
Lokitsu
Posts: 589
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:11 am
Location: New England

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-09-18 An Aggressive Stance

Post by Lokitsu » Fri Sep 07, 2018 3:17 am

Gotoh wrote:
Fri Sep 07, 2018 1:27 am
Error of Logic wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 9:40 pm
Probably the other men who fetched up against a virgin succubus were plain vanilla mortals, were not 'blessed' with people who could warn and prepare them, and so wound up in the ranks of mysterious deaths and disappearances.
Dead people still end up on the news, or the obituary, even if the victims die under mysterious circumstances. Though, in succubi related incidents, you'd think the cause of death would be attributed 'wild animal attack' or something.

I'm not being contrarian, it's just one of those things that makes me wonder how the existence of cryptids, magic users, etc. has remained a secret from the public all this time, despite events like this one and the invasion of Montreal.
The tired old cliche of "No-one believes in the supernatural despite loads of evidence" has never been particularly realistic and works best in comedies and light action stories where the audience doesn't bother to question minor details like missing persons or enormous light shows in heavily populated areas. Since you've already made it this far in DC, I wouldn't bother worrying about it.

Post Reply