Page 4 of 10

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 1:04 am
by vampire hunter D
yeah,, Abby is more like Tia than a Succubus

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 1:53 am
by FuzzyFace
Tia? Tia plans things out, usually in ways to make other people miserable. She thinks ahead, even if her whims are childlike at times. "Thinks things out" is the opposite of Abby.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 6:25 am
by Kisai
Fluffy wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:50 pm
This one (DC) just fails miserably being that.
You're welcome to go read other webcomics if you don't like Dangerously Chloe.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 7:53 am
by renmei
Gotoh wrote:
Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:44 am
renmei wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 11:04 pm
We have no idea what consequences Abby's transformation entails and we don't know if she's still a kid mentally.
Jason plainly said she is in the last part of the thread's OP.
My bad. I missed that part. Well maybe the speculation about chaos is spot on then. :-?

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 9:27 am
by X3N0-Life-Form
lordoffiling wrote:
Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:10 am
Agreed. This thing might resolve itself when Ilsa gets sick of Abby and punts her out of Tatarus, forcing her to leave the wings and horns behind.
"Decarlo, you're suspended, turn in your wings and your horns."

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 9:54 am
by Storm-forge mystique
I guess that's how the creepiness is resolved - Chloe's explaining what happened to Teddi, and in walks Abby, expelled and chronologically older than either of them.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 9:57 am
by Error of Logic
If only it were likely for this comic to end that smoothly...
Then again, it'd mean Abigail with her child's mind would have been through succubus-lessons.
... Ick.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:21 am
by Fluffy
Kisai wrote:
Fri Feb 09, 2018 6:25 am
Fluffy wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:50 pm
This one (DC) just fails miserably being that.
You're welcome to go read other webcomics if you don't like Dangerously Chloe.
If only it were that easy.But, after you've invested so much time reading a comic that started off entertaining, it's hard to just drop it after it goes down the proverbial toilet.

This is why I welcome people to add me to their ignore list if my ever present criticism of the plot bothers them; because I'm in this until the bitter end, and I'm not about to withhold my opinion because a few people disagree with it.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:13 pm
by Tako
LarsenSan wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 1:13 pm
Agh, her face looks like a blow-up sexdoll.
Pretty much, yes...

As a matter of fact, Chloe does look like an inflatable doll too... Pandora and Slash-Stab look more natural...

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:39 pm
by Absinthe Green
'J' wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:40 am
God damn it pixietrix. Can we please try not to sexualize the pre-teen girl?
Better idea.

Why don't we quit condescending to adolescents by assuming they have no sex drives of their own that are completely unique to them & then compounding that condescension by pulling the rug out from under their erotic agency just because said drives/agency makes us uncomfortable?

Perhaps young people - young girls/women in particular - wouldn't be so vulnerable to sexual predation if they had access to the information, contraception & respect-based privacy they need to make & execute sound decisions w/ regard to their sex lives/education instead of having their erotic confidence forever being cut off at the knees by the hopelessly well-intentioned yet utterly patronizing set.

Just Sayin'.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 2:12 pm
by Fereshte
Absinthe Green wrote:
Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:39 pm
'J' wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:40 am
God damn it pixietrix. Can we please try not to sexualize the pre-teen girl?
Better idea.

Why don't we quit condescending to adolescents by assuming they have no sex drives of their own that are completely unique to them & then compounding that condescension by pulling the rug out from under their erotic agency just because said drives/agency makes us uncomfortable?

Perhaps young people - young girls/women in particular - wouldn't be so vulnerable to sexual predation if they had access to the information, contraception & respect-based privacy they need to make & execute decisions w/ regard to their sex lives/education instead of having their erotic confidence forever being cut off at the knees by the hopelessly well-intentioned yet utterly patronizing set.

Just Sayin'.

Yeah, no. Not wanting adults to sexualized young girls, especially prepubescent girls, isn’t condescending their sex drive or their sexual agency. It also makes them MORE vulnerable to predators to say adults should and could sexualize their bodies. If Abby wants to have sex with someone her own age, that’s one thing. But that clearly isn’t what’s happening here. Your defense of the sexualization of a child is...kind of creepy.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 2:37 pm
by Fluffy
OMG - yes, exactly!

Every time I see a post saying 'Well, Abby is a matured succubus now; so age is irrelevant' always comes off as people making an excuse to justify the sexualization of a minor - especially considering the artist himself confirms that, though she's got the body of a mature woman, Abby is still a twelve year old girl.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 2:56 pm
by Mandy
And then all the pedophiles said "oh boy! Giant tits! That's exactly what I'm into!"... Oh wait. No they didn't.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 4:08 pm
by rogermart
I have to ask: Are all men that saw 13 going on 30 and found Jennifer Garner hot excusing the sexualization of a minor? are all woman doing the same thing with Tom Hanks in Big?

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 4:15 pm
by dmra
Given that we're only in the establishing scenes of this arc I think it's a bit early to say exactly how it will turn out and people may be getting bothered about nothing.

On the other hand since the Teddy turning into Teddi story line seemed to be nothing but an excuse for changing a character who up until that point had been a fairly conventional and romantic type into somebody who would sleep with anything with a pulse I think people can be forgiven for fearing the worst for the likely outcome of Abby's adventures.