Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Discuss EC/MC/DC here!

Moderators: Dave Zero1, Don Alexander, Giz, midgetshrimp, Cassandra

Post Reply
User avatar
vampire hunter D
Posts: 4095
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:19 pm
Location: Jasoom

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by vampire hunter D »

yeah,, Abby is more like Tia than a Succubus
Pointless arguing is one of the three pillars upon which the Internet is built. The other two are of course cat pictures and porn.

User avatar
FuzzyFace
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:39 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by FuzzyFace »

Tia? Tia plans things out, usually in ways to make other people miserable. She thinks ahead, even if her whims are childlike at times. "Thinks things out" is the opposite of Abby.

User avatar
Kisai
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:37 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by Kisai »

Fluffy wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:50 pm
This one (DC) just fails miserably being that.
You're welcome to go read other webcomics if you don't like Dangerously Chloe.

renmei
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:50 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by renmei »

Gotoh wrote:
Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:44 am
renmei wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 11:04 pm
We have no idea what consequences Abby's transformation entails and we don't know if she's still a kid mentally.
Jason plainly said she is in the last part of the thread's OP.
My bad. I missed that part. Well maybe the speculation about chaos is spot on then. :-?

X3N0-Life-Form
Posts: 221
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:22 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by X3N0-Life-Form »

lordoffiling wrote:
Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:10 am
Agreed. This thing might resolve itself when Ilsa gets sick of Abby and punts her out of Tatarus, forcing her to leave the wings and horns behind.
"Decarlo, you're suspended, turn in your wings and your horns."

User avatar
Storm-forge mystique
Posts: 2258
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:34 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by Storm-forge mystique »

I guess that's how the creepiness is resolved - Chloe's explaining what happened to Teddi, and in walks Abby, expelled and chronologically older than either of them.

User avatar
Error of Logic
Posts: 5862
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by Error of Logic »

If only it were likely for this comic to end that smoothly...
Then again, it'd mean Abigail with her child's mind would have been through succubus-lessons.
... Ick.

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by Fluffy »

Kisai wrote:
Fri Feb 09, 2018 6:25 am
Fluffy wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:50 pm
This one (DC) just fails miserably being that.
You're welcome to go read other webcomics if you don't like Dangerously Chloe.
If only it were that easy.But, after you've invested so much time reading a comic that started off entertaining, it's hard to just drop it after it goes down the proverbial toilet.

This is why I welcome people to add me to their ignore list if my ever present criticism of the plot bothers them; because I'm in this until the bitter end, and I'm not about to withhold my opinion because a few people disagree with it.
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

User avatar
Tako
Posts: 1243
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:40 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by Tako »

LarsenSan wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 1:13 pm
Agh, her face looks like a blow-up sexdoll.
Pretty much, yes...

As a matter of fact, Chloe does look like an inflatable doll too... Pandora and Slash-Stab look more natural...

User avatar
Absinthe Green
Posts: 230
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 9:33 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by Absinthe Green »

'J' wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:40 am
God damn it pixietrix. Can we please try not to sexualize the pre-teen girl?
Better idea.

Why don't we quit condescending to adolescents by assuming they have no sex drives of their own that are completely unique to them & then compounding that condescension by pulling the rug out from under their erotic agency just because said drives/agency makes us uncomfortable?

Perhaps young people - young girls/women in particular - wouldn't be so vulnerable to sexual predation if they had access to the information, contraception & respect-based privacy they need to make & execute sound decisions w/ regard to their sex lives/education instead of having their erotic confidence forever being cut off at the knees by the hopelessly well-intentioned yet utterly patronizing set.

Just Sayin'.
Last edited by Absinthe Green on Fri Feb 09, 2018 2:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I will remember the kisses / our lips raw with love / and how you gave me everything you had / and how I / offered you everything that was left / of me." - CB.

Fereshte
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:59 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by Fereshte »

Absinthe Green wrote:
Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:39 pm
'J' wrote:
Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:40 am
God damn it pixietrix. Can we please try not to sexualize the pre-teen girl?
Better idea.

Why don't we quit condescending to adolescents by assuming they have no sex drives of their own that are completely unique to them & then compounding that condescension by pulling the rug out from under their erotic agency just because said drives/agency makes us uncomfortable?

Perhaps young people - young girls/women in particular - wouldn't be so vulnerable to sexual predation if they had access to the information, contraception & respect-based privacy they need to make & execute decisions w/ regard to their sex lives/education instead of having their erotic confidence forever being cut off at the knees by the hopelessly well-intentioned yet utterly patronizing set.

Just Sayin'.

Yeah, no. Not wanting adults to sexualized young girls, especially prepubescent girls, isn’t condescending their sex drive or their sexual agency. It also makes them MORE vulnerable to predators to say adults should and could sexualize their bodies. If Abby wants to have sex with someone her own age, that’s one thing. But that clearly isn’t what’s happening here. Your defense of the sexualization of a child is...kind of creepy.

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by Fluffy »

OMG - yes, exactly!

Every time I see a post saying 'Well, Abby is a matured succubus now; so age is irrelevant' always comes off as people making an excuse to justify the sexualization of a minor - especially considering the artist himself confirms that, though she's got the body of a mature woman, Abby is still a twelve year old girl.
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

User avatar
Mandy
Posts: 209
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:21 pm
Location: Gotham

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by Mandy »

And then all the pedophiles said "oh boy! Giant tits! That's exactly what I'm into!"... Oh wait. No they didn't.

User avatar
rogermart
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 10:04 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by rogermart »

I have to ask: Are all men that saw 13 going on 30 and found Jennifer Garner hot excusing the sexualization of a minor? are all woman doing the same thing with Tom Hanks in Big?
That's what i do... i drink and i know things...

dmra
Posts: 767
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 8-02-18 Booger

Post by dmra »

Given that we're only in the establishing scenes of this arc I think it's a bit early to say exactly how it will turn out and people may be getting bothered about nothing.

On the other hand since the Teddy turning into Teddi story line seemed to be nothing but an excuse for changing a character who up until that point had been a fairly conventional and romantic type into somebody who would sleep with anything with a pulse I think people can be forgiven for fearing the worst for the likely outcome of Abby's adventures.

Post Reply