Pixie Trix Comix & Hiveworks Community

Just got caught up, after having discovered this comic just recently. This business with Abby is... Well, it's frankly pretty gross. I really hope it stops, and in a hurry.

Not a big fan of Pandora, either, especially after the "banged yo momma" page. As I understand it, that particular page led to quite the incident. I'd be interested to learn more about that, if it's not too taboo.

Welcome to the modern forum, Valkog! Get your throwing tomatoes at the door.

"Throwing tomatoes"? I don't follow.

People throw tomatoes at thing they find particularly bad; and there are a number of us forum peeps who find the last few chapters of this series have been particular cringe worthy.

The trouble is with this storyline is its difficult to get the right balance between this just being another "Talking heads" style webcomic and a vehicle for gratuitous fanservice for its own sake. I'm not a particular fan of either to be honest but at least with the latter I get to find Waltrip's censorship methods amusing. In any case it's the fault of the pacing and staging of the storyline as much as the storyline itself.

lordoffiling wrote: ↑

Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:57 pm

OllieOrOlly wrote: ↑

Thu Nov 30, 2017 5:13 am

Gratuitous nudity, however, it is fairly restrained by being on one panel only, non-sexual, and involves Chloe; I'm making note of this, but not complaining.
Good to see Chloe actually present in her series again, though, admittedly, not confident it will last...

Okay, I gotta ask.

You complain about nudity a lot. Why? All of the Trixverse comics are heavily cheesecakey (and beefcakey for that matter), and they always have been. It’s part of the brand. What’s the prob?

Not complaining about the nudity itself, but rather the substitution of plot and humour with nudity.

Chloe really reminds me of her mom here!! *thinks about what Chloe used to be and act like*

otaku247 wrote: ↑

Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:11 am

I'm not a particular fan of either to be honest but at least with the latter I get to find Waltrip's censorship methods amusing.

A bit more originality with that might actually be funny. But as it is, it’s all amazingly opaque shower foam and unsubtle use of speech balloons. Doing something like an Austin Powers credit sequence seems to be too much trouble.

Come to think of it - where is this light source coming from that we can see Chloe's silhouette through the shower curtain?

I could understand someone seeing a silhouette while they were standing in the shower - as the light source is on the outside of the shower; but not the other way around.

Just an artistic nitpick.

Maybe an overhead light?

Or just ambient light reflecting off white tile works, if the shower curtain is translucent