Page 2 of 4

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:23 am
by Alexander Collins
That actually makes sense. Hell would definetly have looser to no morels since its... Hell. Chloe probably wouldn't notice it because she's a bit too trusting and/or Pandora is that good at manipulating her.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:16 am
by brasca
Well Teddi is a smart girl I'm sure she'll think of something or find some people who can eliminate her problem. Taking down a succubus is bound to make Gabrielle and Tandy popular at Artemis. And Charity could definitely get a promotion out of that.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 8:04 am
by UNStoppable
Way I see it is that Pandora is going to point out to Teddi that she has everything she wants, so why not use her [Teddi's] pheromones on her Dad to get him to accept things like she does when she's stripping. With obvious results from there.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 9:06 am
by OllieOrOlly
Much like her mythical namesake, maybe Pandora's motivation is merely curiosity? Not exactly a satisfying reason, yet it is a possibility...

Pandora being a product of Hell appears to be a viable rationale for her behaviour, but it seems that even Hell has laws she ignores and breaks, so it can't completely explain her "chaotic evil."

The fact Pandora's final word ends in a hyphen, perhaps Teddi is about to choke a bitch? (Old reference, but still works). Or Teddi's human-succubus-reaper status grants Scanners-like powers? Either way, Teddi has murder in the eyes!

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 10:14 am
by Error of Logic
I'm surprised Teddi hasn't visited a church and acquired some holy water yet.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 10:45 am
by lordoffiling
It kills me that people in this thread are *just now* coming to the realization, apparently, that the reason Pandora is so evil just might be because she COMES FROM HELL.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 11:06 am
by Zorlond
1. Just because strangulation didn't work the last time doesn't mean Teddi is out of options on the violent front. Angry as she is right now, I wouldn't be surprised if she tested out the "Exorcist" approach (head 360), or the "Gallagher" approach (melon smash).
2. Just because Pandora's a product of her home environment is still not an excuse for her behavior. Would you accept it if she were a regular human who came from a horrific childhood? Or would you react differently if she wasn't a sexy female?

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 1:31 pm
by tau neutrino
Would anyone object if Teddi slapped her back?

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:17 pm
by dmra
Chloe is also from Hell and she doesn't strike me as being "evil" to the core. That's possibly because at least part of her upbringing was in the human world. On the other hand Charity the angel is hardly an unalloyed example of "good" so it seems that plane of origin isn't the sole factor which determines whether a character is "good" or "evil".

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:26 pm
by sun tzu
Insectoid wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:29 am
Let the fists fly! I think Pandora kinda deserves it by now...?
"By now"? Pandora has always been awful. :-L

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:39 pm
by Insectoid
*shrugs*

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:41 pm
by Alexander Collins
tau neutrino wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2017 1:31 pm
Would anyone object if Teddi slapped her back?
https://media.tenor.com/images/2d1f4af5 ... /tenor.gif

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:54 pm
by Cortez
Zorlond wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2017 11:06 am
1. Just because strangulation didn't work the last time doesn't mean Teddi is out of options on the violent front.
That was when he was a regular human, not he's part reaper and part succubus.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:54 pm
by Spidrift
The comic runs on Generic Contemporary Geek Supernatural Morality. So demons are self-centered but free-spirited flakes while angels are self-righteous jerks who are sometimes, annoyingly, technically in the right. (What would be really radical and transgressive these days would be a story in which demons were totally evil and angels were unambiguously good.) In that style of story, only humans with limited social power are ever really good people, though a weak and confused spirit-being like Chloe may have some chance of not being a total jerk.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 6:17 pm
by BlairFan
That was mean of Pandora! Even for her!!
D: