Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Discuss EC/MC/DC here!

Moderators: Dave Zero1, Don Alexander, Giz, midgetshrimp, Cassandra

Alexander Collins
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 6:58 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by Alexander Collins » Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:23 am

That actually makes sense. Hell would definetly have looser to no morels since its... Hell. Chloe probably wouldn't notice it because she's a bit too trusting and/or Pandora is that good at manipulating her.

User avatar
brasca
Posts: 2913
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:04 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by brasca » Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:16 am

Well Teddi is a smart girl I'm sure she'll think of something or find some people who can eliminate her problem. Taking down a succubus is bound to make Gabrielle and Tandy popular at Artemis. And Charity could definitely get a promotion out of that.

UNStoppable
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:32 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by UNStoppable » Mon Sep 11, 2017 8:04 am

Way I see it is that Pandora is going to point out to Teddi that she has everything she wants, so why not use her [Teddi's] pheromones on her Dad to get him to accept things like she does when she's stripping. With obvious results from there.

OllieOrOlly
Posts: 189
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 8:48 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by OllieOrOlly » Mon Sep 11, 2017 9:06 am

Much like her mythical namesake, maybe Pandora's motivation is merely curiosity? Not exactly a satisfying reason, yet it is a possibility...

Pandora being a product of Hell appears to be a viable rationale for her behaviour, but it seems that even Hell has laws she ignores and breaks, so it can't completely explain her "chaotic evil."

The fact Pandora's final word ends in a hyphen, perhaps Teddi is about to choke a bitch? (Old reference, but still works). Or Teddi's human-succubus-reaper status grants Scanners-like powers? Either way, Teddi has murder in the eyes!

User avatar
Error of Logic
Posts: 4956
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by Error of Logic » Mon Sep 11, 2017 10:14 am

I'm surprised Teddi hasn't visited a church and acquired some holy water yet.
My comic, Res Mira, starts here.

The crazy will bust loose. Either in the stories or on the forum. Or both at the same time.

Mad theory: Eulice is actually a retired succubus. This explains why she says DiDi Chastel looks like she did in her younger years. She maintains her current form because it allows her to get through her day without having to turn down sexual advances.

A busty redhead by decree of the Internet...? o.o;

User avatar
lordoffiling
Posts: 489
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 6:48 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by lordoffiling » Mon Sep 11, 2017 10:45 am

It kills me that people in this thread are *just now* coming to the realization, apparently, that the reason Pandora is so evil just might be because she COMES FROM HELL.
"Rather than simply enjoying these comics, we log in to these forums to argue about them. [...] We are some strange people, and I guess we have nothing better to do." - lordoffiling

Zorlond
Posts: 532
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:17 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by Zorlond » Mon Sep 11, 2017 11:06 am

1. Just because strangulation didn't work the last time doesn't mean Teddi is out of options on the violent front. Angry as she is right now, I wouldn't be surprised if she tested out the "Exorcist" approach (head 360), or the "Gallagher" approach (melon smash).
2. Just because Pandora's a product of her home environment is still not an excuse for her behavior. Would you accept it if she were a regular human who came from a horrific childhood? Or would you react differently if she wasn't a sexy female?

User avatar
tau neutrino
Posts: 331
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 7:28 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by tau neutrino » Mon Sep 11, 2017 1:31 pm

Would anyone object if Teddi slapped her back?

dmra
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by dmra » Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:17 pm

Chloe is also from Hell and she doesn't strike me as being "evil" to the core. That's possibly because at least part of her upbringing was in the human world. On the other hand Charity the angel is hardly an unalloyed example of "good" so it seems that plane of origin isn't the sole factor which determines whether a character is "good" or "evil".

User avatar
sun tzu
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 6:19 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by sun tzu » Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:26 pm

Insectoid wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:29 am
Let the fists fly! I think Pandora kinda deserves it by now...?
"By now"? Pandora has always been awful. :-L

User avatar
Insectoid
Posts: 724
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:05 am
Location: Oblivion, whence the great swarm comes.
Contact:

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by Insectoid » Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:39 pm

*shrugs*
For those curious: my avatar is an artistic rendering of a spaceship I drew for a primitive (by today's standards) multiplayer online game called XPilot. (More about both on my website.)

Bzzz.

Alexander Collins
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 6:58 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by Alexander Collins » Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:41 pm

tau neutrino wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2017 1:31 pm
Would anyone object if Teddi slapped her back?
https://media.tenor.com/images/2d1f4af5 ... /tenor.gif

User avatar
Cortez
Posts: 1805
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:53 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by Cortez » Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:54 pm

Zorlond wrote:
Mon Sep 11, 2017 11:06 am
1. Just because strangulation didn't work the last time doesn't mean Teddi is out of options on the violent front.
That was when he was a regular human, not he's part reaper and part succubus.

User avatar
Spidrift
Posts: 11498
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by Spidrift » Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:54 pm

The comic runs on Generic Contemporary Geek Supernatural Morality. So demons are self-centered but free-spirited flakes while angels are self-righteous jerks who are sometimes, annoyingly, technically in the right. (What would be really radical and transgressive these days would be a story in which demons were totally evil and angels were unambiguously good.) In that style of story, only humans with limited social power are ever really good people, though a weak and confused spirit-being like Chloe may have some chance of not being a total jerk.
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.

BlairFan
Yap Yap Sycophant
Posts: 6912
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 11-09-17 Still Not Safe For Me

Post by BlairFan » Mon Sep 11, 2017 6:17 pm

That was mean of Pandora! Even for her!!
D:

Post Reply