Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Discuss EC/MC/DC here!

Moderators: Dave Zero1, Don Alexander, Giz, midgetshrimp, Cassandra

JoybuzzerX
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:02 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by JoybuzzerX »

edisnooM wrote:
Thu Aug 10, 2017 2:21 am
Yeah, personally this strikes me as kind of sketchy, not only because of the apparent continued shift in Teddy's gender / orientation due to the transformation, but also because of how Teddy "made it up" to Alchemy.
I don't know. I felt Teddy had an attraction to Al the whole time. Now they just went all the way, enjoyed by both, likely not the way either figured it would be if it did happen.

Loved the end here :)

User avatar
Cortez
Posts: 2419
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:53 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by Cortez »

'J' wrote:
Thu Aug 10, 2017 5:30 am
So, is Teddy still going to school I wonder? Because of one of his teachers were to show up at the club one night...
If it's a male teacher, it won't be an issue thanks to the pheromones. The issue would be if it's a female teacher.
'J' wrote:
Thu Aug 10, 2017 4:50 am


Yeah, well, the alternative would've been for Teddy to fix his mistake by correcting the imbalance he caused


Like in Final Destination?

User avatar
vampire hunter D
Posts: 4095
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:19 pm
Location: Jasoom

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by vampire hunter D »

I'm wondering now if Autumn will remember anything that happened while she was disembodied
Pointless arguing is one of the three pillars upon which the Internet is built. The other two are of course cat pictures and porn.

'J'
A Figment of your Imagination
Posts: 5690
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by 'J' »

If she does, she'll probably chalk it up to the drugs
Yet still, I live...

OllieOrOlly
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 8:48 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by OllieOrOlly »

Don't know if there are "powers that be," but assuming there are, I doubt one of their employee's personal gratification would be tolerated as recompense for lost profit...

dmra
Posts: 767
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:21 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by dmra »

This page seems to sum up everything I don't like about the recent direction of Dangerously Chloe.

What started out a pretty original story about the efforts of a succubus to save her victim and the story of their relationship has now basically become a full on version of an MA3 style sex comedy but with supernatural elements.

Considering the main idea was Chloe trying to find Teddy a girlfriend while having genuine feelings for him herself it's a bit ironic that Teddy is having sexual encounters with half the cast while barely interacting with Chloe.

'J'
A Figment of your Imagination
Posts: 5690
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by 'J' »

OllieOrOlly wrote:
Thu Aug 10, 2017 8:14 am
Don't know if there are "powers that be," but assuming there are, I doubt one of their employee's personal gratification would be tolerated as recompense for lost profit...
Maybe Al can pay it forward?
Yet still, I live...

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by Fluffy »

I don't know which annoys me more; the fact that Teddy shows no regard for the fact that he could very well be responsible for 'killing' Al by interfering with his work or the fact that his immediate solution to the problem is to fuck Al on a bed of money.

Al just told him that he could 'die' because Teddy decided he could cheat death and save a co-worker; could Teddy try to show some actual concern about someone he supposedly cares about instead of treating it like it's a mild, forgivable screw up on his part?

This is a character we're supposed to root for, really? /:)
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

User avatar
lordoffiling
Posts: 826
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 6:48 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by lordoffiling »

I wish I could understand why people are getting so bent out of shape. These two have had feelings for each other for a long time now.
"Rather than simply enjoying these comics, we log in to these forums to argue about them. [...] We are some strange people, and I guess we have nothing better to do." - lordoffiling

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by Fluffy »

lordoffiling wrote:
Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:09 am
I wish I could understand why people are getting so bent out of shape. These two have had feelings for each other for a long time now.
It's not the fact they slept together that's the issue here; it's what led up to it that is.
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

User avatar
Derfman
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 6:16 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by Derfman »

Well, since Teddi for a while now has been able to see ghost, they could just chalk it up to the fact that s/he saw the co-workers ghost and decided to save her. Al had no say in it. Problem solved. :)

User avatar
Pier777
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:45 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by Pier777 »

Fluffy wrote:
Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:11 am
I don't know which annoys me more; the fact that Teddy shows no regard for the fact that he could very well be responsible for 'killing' Al by interfering with his work or the fact that his immediate solution to the problem is to fuck Al on a bed of money.

Al just told him that he could 'die' because Teddy decided he could cheat death and save a co-worker; could Teddy try to show some actual concern about someone he supposedly cares about instead of treating it like it's a mild, forgivable screw up on his part?

This is a character we're supposed to root for, really? /:)
I agree. I wonder what would've happened if Teddi DID know the possible repercussions. Would he be able to NOT attempt to save the OD'd girl? Because technically, it is 1000000x preferable to let the girl die and still be EXISTING (in heaven, for instance) than Al's predicament, which is not existing at all.

Oh well, guess we would never know... UNLESS we go into alternate universe world!

DoggieDog52
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:04 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by DoggieDog52 »

Yeah I'm in the same disappointed camp too. I know this is a pretty substantial arc for Teddy but he's practically a completely different character now.

That said, I feel like going all the way is REALLY going to fuck with Chloe which may advance the plot on her end. I just wish it was done in a different way. So far all of Teddi's romps have been pretty spontaneous and haven't been for any reason other than the gag. Yes he's closer to Alchemy but the style that the two got together is hard to take seriously. But it is a gag comic so I guess I don't know what I expected.

Maybe we'll see what happens with Chloe soon. I dunno. It just feels so odd to have a main character be pushed to the side for so long.

JTheCreator
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:37 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by JTheCreator »

Sounds like someone on her owes me an apology for the argument about Reaper protocol and why Alchemy can't "save" Chloe.

Also, come on Al! Wasn't ejecting Teddi with ectoplasm once enough? ;)
Behold, my current in development comic book series and the many links you could share for me!

Website: http://www.thedaemoschronicles.com

Twitter Feed: https://twitter.com/DaemosChronicle

rpr
Posts: 205
Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 2:07 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 10-08-17 Supposed to be Dead

Post by rpr »

Am I the only one who is perplexed by the sudden revival of Autumn? It looks like she was holding her breath all the tim

Post Reply