Page 1 of 3

Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 2:13 am
by Jason Waltrip
New Strip! Having decided to not run away from his houseful of troubles, Teddi opts for the next best thing.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 2:36 am
by Insectoid
But a sleepover... where? :p

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 2:37 am
by Storm-forge mystique
Malacath, Mehrunes Dagon, Molag Bal, Sheogorath. Abby, Lance, Chloe, Pandora?

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 2:44 am
by edisnooM
Although I didn't really think it was possible, with every recent strip I am getting more and more angry at Pandora. Everything she is doing here seems to be for little more reason than to make Teddy's life miserable, and seeing how she seemed so aware of Chloe's state I can't help feeling like she would know the affect her "thralldom" of Lance would have on Chloe.

And on that note still no one seems particularly inclined to do anything about Pandora mind controlling and raping Lance.

Also I wonder which of Teddy's thralls will be "lucky" enough to have him stay at their place.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 2:51 am
by Cortez
Storm-forge mystique wrote:Malacath, Mehrunes Dagon, Molag Bal, Sheogorath. Abby, Lance, Chloe, Pandora?
Elder Scrolls reference, yeah?

And i guess Teddy ended up having to move out anyway.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 2:54 am
by Varanus
I find it a bit hard to sympathize with any of the victims here simply because nobody in universe seems to care very much either. Even Teddy just seems really annoyed, as evidenced by how after two days he's done nothing to try to resolve any of this. I guess he believes that keeping this ruse up until his dad's visit is done is simply the only option?

And why is Abby so accepting of everything? I get she's been pretty flanderized over time but still...

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 3:35 am
by FuzzyFace
Yeah, we seem to be sort of in limbo, here. If Lance sticks around, Teddi can't, really. And... did Chloe actually punch through the wall, or was that a dream?

But Lance's stay does appear to be temporary (although I'd love to know with whom he was speaking on the phone).

But assuming he will stick around for a bit, and the story is going to move on, the most interesting thing would be if Teddi somehow wound up with either Naomi/Prudence or Gabby/Tandy. No idea how that would happen, sadly.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 3:39 am
by 'J'
edisnooM wrote:Although I didn't really think it was possible, with every recent strip I am getting more and more angry at Pandora. Everything she is doing here seems to be for little more reason than to make Teddy's life miserable, and seeing how she seemed so aware of Chloe's state I can't help feeling like she would know the affect her "thralldom" of Lance would have on Chloe.
yeah, it's almost like she's some sort of evil sex-demon from hell, or something

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 4:03 am
by BioYuGi
How did Teddi go from wearing a t-shirt to just a bra and unbuttoned pants? Like if she's trying to bolt out of there, I can see grabbing a pair of pants but why would she had taken something OFF?

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 4:13 am
by edisnooM
'J' wrote: yeah, it's almost like she's some sort of evil sex-demon from hell, or something
Oh I agree it shouldn't be overly surprising, but it's also the fact of why she is even here? Her entire purpose seems to be simply to make Teddy's life miserable, a fact that even Chloe seems to realize (see her chloroforming Pandora before Teddy's date way back), and yet they still let her stay at the house. And with her latest exploits where she has enthralled and is taking extensive sexual liberties with Teddy and Abby's father, and everyone is being maddeningly passive about it.

Not to mention if she was aware that what she is doing would push Chloe into her feral state (which it seems like she would) then she is pretty much OK with Teddy being killed (and Chloe doing it), and yet I kind of doubt anyone will even comment on that.

I mean if it seemed like she would at some point receive her comeuppance it might not be as frustrating, but on the whole it seems like she will simply persist in her current role unimpeded.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 4:15 am
by vampire hunter D
Ok, I'd rather he not go to one of his groupies. So, maybe Naomi (whivh would bring Pru and Gabby into this) or Triana?

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 4:57 am
by Alexander Collins
It seems everyone in the Pixie-verse is incompetent, stupid or morally bankrupt...

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 4:59 am
by Alexander Collins
Raise your hand if you think Slash-Stab is Pandora's mother/ reason she is hiding in the surface world. :-?

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 5:02 am
by Cortez
vampire hunter D wrote:Ok, I'd rather he not go to one of his groupies. So, maybe Naomi (whivh would bring Pru and Gabby into this) or Triana?
Except how does that make sense? At least with his groupies he knows they will be ok with her staying with them. Plus, Teddy still thinks Naomi and Triana hate him.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 29-06-17 Deep in a Dark Forest

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 9:18 am
by renmei
I think the feeling is "we get it, his life sucks, can we get to the part where it doesn't already"? Personally I'd like to see Teddy get something out of his new anatomy besides a boob job and super pheromones. It's not exactly stopping Chloe from trying to eat him alive anymore, and at this point his life can't get much more rock bottom. Well it could, but it would be impressive to see how. :))