Page 3 of 3

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:48 pm
by Gotoh
brasca wrote:Callista is more of an individual than Sandi, but she willingly subordinates herself to Faith so I think lackey is an appropriate term.
The only two who fit the description are Sandi and Laura (whom the cast page states is Cess' "hapless sidekick"). Sandi was practically glued to Faith's hip and at her beck and call.

Whereas Callista was often shown to be an individual, be at the archery range, or while she was dating Cerise. We hardly ever saw her and Faith together, which I found odd since they're said to be bffs.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:08 am
by edisnooM
So this strip brought to mind three things:

1.) Gabby and Tandy seem to be somewhat knowledgeable about demonic pacts etc., so I'm curious if they might know or be able to find a way to break out of one, possibly with the actual intent of stopping the current goings on, especially if they think the current situation was the deal.

2.) With them now investigating the cause of the current effects (and most likely a countermeasure), I wonder if their investigation or whatever they come up with will have a possible side effect of undoing the transformation.

And 3.) I went back to refresh my memory and Chloe said that in order to wiggle out of the pact the girl needed to feel the connection in her heart, and I'm wondering if any of this possibly fits the bill, or if the artificial nature rules it out.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:30 am
by GKNolan
1) Maybe, but I'm sure their area of expertise is breaking pact-makers, not pacts.
2) Not impossible, I'm sure there's some narrative gymnastics that can lead to that goal.
3) Which raises a question; so long as Teddy only has eyes for Chloe, can the pact be even be broken (like that).

Quote removed. The DAMNed

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:58 am
by edisnooM
Yeah number 3 was one reason Gabby and Tandy possibly coming up with a third way out occurred to me as a potential loop hole. Though, if those currently under the influence did qualify would all Teddy have to do is ask "Will you be my girlfriend?" Chloe never specified Teddy had to have a connection, and it would "technically" be true.

For that matter, given the innately tricky legalese nature of "deals with the devil" in most stories, would simply having a friend who is a girl also qualify? It would be kind of funny if all this time they were completely overthinking the way out.

Quote removed. The DAMNed

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 6:22 am
by Cortez
Though they don't know what Teddy asked for in the pack. Not yet.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:14 am
by Osaru Sensei
brasca wrote:Callista.
Gimme.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:00 pm
by wiseguy
Insectoid wrote:@Cortez: Well, she already had an opportunity to...

mmmmmmmm

I think we got the jackpot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


the guys might have "slapped him and maybe use towels on him as slings" and they see it as "pounding him" but if Teddi sees what the 4 girls did to him as "first time someone hit me" and not think about this slap...............................? that could explain it the difference of opinions about whether the guys were lying or not??

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:44 pm
by Cortez
The girls were punching and kicking him though. It also did kick in his defensive pheromones.

Plus Teddy's exact words were that "the boys never hit me".

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 2:26 am
by Gotoh
@Cortez: Which we know to be incorrect, because according to Dave01, they did hit him (but not in the face).

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:25 pm
by brasca
Yes it would seem that the boys operate under the same rules of Anchormen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipsPgNEmAXI

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:24 am
by Cortez
Gotoh wrote:@Cortez: Which we know to be incorrect, because according to Dave01, they did hit him (but not in the face).

That would still prove you wrong when you claimed the boys were worse. Even Dave said the girls went further than the guys.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:27 am
by Gotoh
@Cortez: I never said the boys were worse, I said they must've hit him, otherwise, that jock was misusing the word "pounding".

On that note, I'm curious what Teddi considers "hitting" since he claims they never did. Yet, we have confirmation to the contrary.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2017 2:20 am
by Cortez

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2017 8:34 am
by Gotoh
Cortez wrote:You did actually.
Look at what I wrote again.

Teddi (not me) said he had taken worse from other bullies. Then said he had never been hit before, despite what he said previously and despite those jocks plainly saying they pounded him. Which is why I said their statements were contradictory.

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:14 pm
by Don Alexander
Oh, this again... 8-|

Anyway, I'd say these girls need to mosey over to DoesNotPlayWellWithOthers and have themselves some sexbots built. :P