Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6of 6

Discuss EC/MC/DC here!

Moderators: Dave Zero1, Don Alexander, Giz, midgetshrimp, Cassandra

Post Reply
User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3411
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Fluffy » Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:12 pm

I'd root more for Acina/Grace to be re-absorbed into Ace's psyche and Ace never being aware she even existed; because the other option (Acina/Grace somehow obtaining her own body) would be nothing less than traumatic for Ace - as he'll come to learn what his supposed friends were doing to him for an extended period of time within his knowledge/consent.
Last edited by Fluffy on Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

Judanas
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 1:15 pm

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Judanas » Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:19 pm

The concern with 'Re-absorbed' is that if she is a separate person now (Regardless of if she was in the past) then reabsorbion would be the death of her consciousness and her as a person.

Death of the Mind is something that makes me deeply uncomfortable.

This is not a good situation and there really isn't good solutions.

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3411
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Fluffy » Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:24 pm

Would you consider a person with split personalities being separate individuals, or all part of the same psyche?

Because, that's how I see Acina in this mini-comic; a split personality who has the ability to transform her host body into that of which she identifies with; essentially hijacking Ace's body to do as she pleases once a month without his knowledge/consent.

So, my concern lands solely on Ace's well being; not hers.
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

User avatar
Dorgengoa
BANNED
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:45 am
Location: On your grave, dancing my heart out.
Contact:

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Dorgengoa » Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:26 pm

The "ideal situation" would be for Ace's supposed buddies to tell him the truth and not use his distressing magical affliction to get their dicks wet, followed by an immediate removal of the female "personality" by any means available, whether it eliminates "her" or not. I'm using quotation marks for maximum condescension, in case that wasn't obvious. This story, the characterisation, and the writing are absolute garbage, and everyone involved should really do better next time. Honestly, I haven't seen anything this horrible since the Aoi House finale.
This is getting out of hand.

Judanas
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 1:15 pm

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Judanas » Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:31 pm

Fluffy wrote:Would you consider a person with split personalities being separate individuals, or all part of the same psyche?
Yeah, while I'm more iffy on it due to the nature of how this all came about. Two people sharing a single body isn't remotely the weirdest thing we've seen. I'd have really liked more explanation on what is going on than we got in six pages.

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3411
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Fluffy » Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:37 pm

But it has been explained, though.

Ever since Ace had reverted back to his original form, he's been trying his best to forget he ever lived his life as a girl. Because he's been repressing it so strongly, his repressed thoughts developed into it's own separate identity (Acina - who considers herself to be the 'real' Ace).

It's a very clear case of a split personality (a la Jeckyl and Hyde) - exaggerated by the fact they live in a supernatural setting.

The fact that Acina is a split personality in a supernatural setting doesn't excuse what she, Kade and Dio are consciously doing to Ace - who is completely unaware of what's happening to him.
Last edited by Fluffy on Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

User avatar
Dorgengoa
BANNED
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:45 am
Location: On your grave, dancing my heart out.
Contact:

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Dorgengoa » Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:40 pm

There isn't a whole lot of room in this for interpretation. Ace is the victim of a highly-unfortunate set of circumstances, and the people he asks to help him (who agree without much of a fuss, mind) take advantage of said circumstances to satisfy their own selfish impulses, and then lie to his face about it while simultaneously planning to repeat the whole thing. This is pretty cut-and-dry, and I don't know why a guy with an avatar containing a chili dog and Harambe is one of the people not trying to justify or rationalise any of it.
This is getting out of hand.

BioYuGi
Posts: 360
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:28 am

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by BioYuGi » Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:53 pm

I really have to wonder if the same people defending the actions of this comic are the same people who were against the scene of Nina and Brooke kissing when they were bimbofied. Because honestly, I feel I could use the same justifications being spouted here to defend that comic. The bimbo forms of Brooke and Nina were totally new characters with their own personalities and didn't deserve to be deleted. They should be allowed to make out with or bang whoever they want. They're the true personalities of those characters, yadayada.

You can't decry that and then be totally fine with this.

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3411
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Fluffy » Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:56 pm

^ All of that, times infinity!

I'll also throw in Quintessa, as well - who was 'killed' after Layla's psyche re-absorbed her into her being.
Dorgengoa wrote:There isn't a whole lot of room in this for interpretation. Ace is the victim of a highly-unfortunate set of circumstances, and the people he asks to help him (who agree without much of a fuss, mind) take advantage of said circumstances to satisfy their own selfish impulses, and then lie to his face about it while simultaneously planning to repeat the whole thing. This is pretty cut-and-dry, and I don't know why a guy with an avatar containing a chili dog and Harambe is one of the people not trying to justify or rationalise any of it.
Because you have morals and find nothing funny about Ace's situation?

I'm personally grateful that more people agree with your sentiment than try to justify the whole thing as funny.
Last edited by Fluffy on Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

User avatar
Dorgengoa
BANNED
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:45 am
Location: On your grave, dancing my heart out.
Contact:

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Dorgengoa » Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:58 pm

BioYuGi wrote:I really have to wonder if the same people defending the actions of this comic are the same people who were against the scene of Nina and Brooke kissing when they were bimbofied. Because honestly, I feel I could use the same justifications being spouted here to defend that comic. The bimbo forms of Brooke and Nina were totally new characters with their own personalities and didn't deserve to be deleted. They should be allowed to make out with or bang whoever they want. They're the true personalities of those characters, yadayada.

You can't decry that and then be totally fine with this.
Yo, big shout-outs to all our fallen bimbo who were straight-up murdered when those horrible people undid the spell. Rest in peace, ladies, you deserved life.
This is getting out of hand.

User avatar
Fluffy
Posts: 3411
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:14 pm

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Fluffy » Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:01 pm

Don't forget Quintessa - who was 'killed' when Layla absorbed her back into her psyche!

Quote removed. The DAMNed
Please, don't come to me expecting me to fix your problems.

User avatar
Dorgengoa
BANNED
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:45 am
Location: On your grave, dancing my heart out.
Contact:

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Dorgengoa » Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:05 pm

Oh, yeah, I almost forgot. Dicks out for Quintessa, y'all.

Quote removed. The DAMNed
This is getting out of hand.

User avatar
Maechris
Posts: 572
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 10:04 am

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Maechris » Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:08 pm

BioYuGi wrote:I really have to wonder if the same people defending the actions of this comic are the same people who were against the scene of Nina and Brooke kissing when they were bimbofied. Because honestly, I feel I could use the same justifications being spouted here to defend that comic. The bimbo forms of Brooke and Nina were totally new characters with their own personalities and didn't deserve to be deleted. They should be allowed to make out with or bang whoever they want. They're the true personalities of those characters, yadayada.

You can't decry that and then be totally fine with this.
Like, totally, man!

#Forfallenbimbos #Neverforget.
More often than not people fail to see the entirety of the issue, and focus on a single facet of it. Ask yourself what makes you right before you set fire on other people for being wrong. // "Chemical reactions between the kawaii and uguu hormones.Within the Desu Gland. This is near to the upper Moe muscle."

Judanas
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 1:15 pm

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Judanas » Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:10 pm

Dorgengoa wrote:There isn't a whole lot of room in this for interpretation. Ace is the victim of a highly-unfortunate set of circumstances, and the people he asks to help him (who agree without much of a fuss, mind) take advantage of said circumstances to satisfy their own selfish impulses, and then lie to his face about it while simultaneously planning to repeat the whole thing. This is pretty cut-and-dry, and I don't know why a guy with an avatar containing a chili dog and Harambe is one of the people not trying to justify or rationalise any of it.
Oh lord yes. Those two are utter scum regardless of if she's a real person or not. They are taking advantage of a 'Friend' (Evidently in only the loosest sense) and lying right to his face about it to serve their selfish ends.

I'm not arguing that she can't be just a split personality (It's one of a few options for this situation) but that the comic could really do with some more explanation/people who understand what is going on. I'm talking about the metaphysical start and end point of 'What is a person' and how the comic completely dodges what could be an interesting debate about the nature of personhood and right to exist.

Tuvix, for example, was a person who was entirely made up of the merged personality of two other people. Existing meant that two other people did not exist. However, that did not make them less of a person them-self. Thus there was an interesting philosophical quandary about mutually exclusive rights to life and what defines someone as a 'Person' or just something to be cured.

User avatar
Raamyah
Creator of small worlds
Posts: 2739
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:57 pm

Re: Eerie Cuties 08-03-17 I was a teen-aged were-girl pg 5-6

Post by Raamyah » Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:37 pm

Gotoh wrote:@Raamyah: I'd prefer Ace just be Ace. We already have Mel for the split persona angle and Alchemy for the male/female shapeshifter. Do we really need another one?

I don't see why Ace should have to be put through this, just 'cuz some readers would rather he be changed back into a girl. That's hardly fair to his character, especially given the circumstances.
Good point. My apologies. #-o
"There are four pillars of existence that support the very foundations of the universe: the speed of light in a vacuum, the Planck constant, Newtonian gravity, and the all-encompassing awesomeness of breasts." - Pauli Polsuo

"No matter how smart you are you can never convince someone stupid that they are stupid." - Anonymous

Post Reply