Dangerously Chloe 6-03-17 Get Out

Discuss EC/MC/DC here!

Moderators: Dave Zero1, Don Alexander, Giz, midgetshrimp, Cassandra

User avatar
FuzzyFace
Posts: 262
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:39 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-03-17 Get Out

Post by FuzzyFace » Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:15 pm

Ritsuki wrote:http://www.dangerouslychloe.com/strips- ... _and_legal
Pru knows about the pact and in Angel terms it does seem to be admitted as marrage, so here we do have the first proper use of the word in the comic.
The words used were "union for life recognized by the heaven authority." But it is also explicitly stated that it is not marriage by either human standards or succubus standards - so what is the basis for say that it is "marriage" and according to what laws? Adultery is inherently a legal definition, and varies by legal system. We have no information on what the bounds of that "heavenly authority" are, if it is neither human nor succubus marriage. You cannot simply assume that Christian rules apply.

Mackus
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:48 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-03-17 Get Out

Post by Mackus » Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:35 pm

Ritsuki wrote:http://www.dangerouslychloe.com/strips- ... _and_legal

Yes and yes,

Pru knows about the pact and in Angel terms it does seem to be admitted as marrage, so here we do have the first proper use of the word in the comic.
But in the very linked strip, Pandy admits that its not monogamy.

User avatar
brasca
Posts: 2909
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:04 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-03-17 Get Out

Post by brasca » Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:20 pm

Alice Macher wrote:Naomi: GET OUT!

Teddi: Out of what? We're outdoors.

Naomi: You're still on my property, so GET OFF!

Teddi: I was about to get off with Gabby, but then I stopped myself, so I'm not sure what you're so mad about.
Seeing as how there wasn't any way to make this situation better might as well have some fun making it worse.

User avatar
Cortez
Posts: 1804
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:53 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-03-17 Get Out

Post by Cortez » Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:30 am

Mackus wrote:
But in the very linked strip, Pandy admits that its not monogamy.
Doesn't mean Angels view it that way though.Especially not an Angel like Pru.

BlairFan
Yap Yap Sycophant
Posts: 6909
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-03-17 Get Out

Post by BlairFan » Tue Mar 07, 2017 8:35 pm

Alice Macher wrote:Naomi: GET OUT!

Teddi: Out of what? We're outdoors.

Naomi: You're still on my property, so GET OFF!

Teddi: I was about to get off with Gabby, but then I stopped myself, so I'm not sure what you're so mad about.

Alice Macher, that pun is HEINOUS!!!
good work! :)) :)) :))

User avatar
sparky
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:09 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-03-17 Get Out

Post by sparky » Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:01 pm

Naomi might want to do something about her breath... :-Q

User avatar
brasca
Posts: 2909
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:04 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-03-17 Get Out

Post by brasca » Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:18 pm

She might want to do something about her hair first. I hope that was just a bucket of potting soil Gabrielle dumped on her head.

User avatar
Don Alexander
Dr. Ebil SithMod
Posts: 27505
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:26 am
Location: Under the arms of the ancient oak, where daylight hangs by a lunar noose...

Re: Dangerously Chloe 6-03-17 Get Out

Post by Don Alexander » Mon May 01, 2017 3:17 pm

Pru seems to be bending the truth a LOT. She definitely saw Gabby, though I guess her sentence can be interpreted as "I haven't seen her just now."

Alsoshe's MEAN toward adulterers!
ImageImage
Sithlord of the Sithling and best customer of McLovecraft's Image, in the business of keeping the little Platypus in business
Moderations in GREEN and signed by the DAMNed. I am not anonymous! Also, MODSMACK!! Image
Winner of the... 2010 Kilopost FRANKIE; 2010 Mad March Nom Off; 2010 Joker Cleavage Contest; 2010 Fan-Thing Contest; 2010 Mimic Contest (tied); 2011 Joker Cleavage Contest; 2011 Contest-for-the-next-Contest (tied)

Post Reply