Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Discuss EC/MC/DC here!

Moderators: Dave Zero1, Don Alexander, Giz, midgetshrimp, Cassandra

Jason Waltrip
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 9:00 pm

Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by Jason Waltrip »

New Strip! For a New Year! :ymparty: Pandora gives Teddy some hands-on experience with his new hybrid form! http://www.dangerouslychloe.com/strips- ... _mish_mash

User avatar
Hyper Magi
Posts: 705
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 8:04 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by Hyper Magi »

I love the way Pandora works.
Sparking now, search within your soul to find the answer!
Push yourself to the edge, give 1000%!

User avatar
Cortez
Posts: 2419
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:53 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by Cortez »

I wonder what Teddi gained from the reaper blood.

Varanus
Posts: 1127
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:23 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by Varanus »

I do like the little bits of succubus biology/physiology we get over the course of this series. Their skin acting like a tongue when touching/being touched by men is a comparison I've never heard used before.

But given how Teddi still gets overwhelmed just getting fondled a bit by Pandora one wanders how he expects to handle going further with men (i.e. he will according to Pandora feel anything they do to him ten times more than he feels with her, which to me makes it sound like he may pass out).

Alexander Collins
Posts: 268
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 6:58 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by Alexander Collins »

Did Pandora just molest Teddi and post it on the internet?

User avatar
Storm-forge mystique
Posts: 2258
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:34 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by Storm-forge mystique »

No, I'm pretty sure she molested him for her private server.

OllieOrOlly
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 8:48 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by OllieOrOlly »

May very well have mentioned this before: damn surprising how risqué this comic can get. As it currently stands, it seems to be the raunchiest strip on the site.

User avatar
Spidrift
Posts: 13180
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:11 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by Spidrift »

Somebody's running a shower head fixation at the moment.

Anyhow... I don't mind the censor suds or the SFW limitations, but I have to say that the art is using them a bit heavy-handedly here. If you can't show Teddi's nipples, fine - put Pandora's hands in the way, or just position the frame border for effect. Magic soap bubbles that act like a gag from an Austin Powers movie, except without the funny, are just silly and immersion-destroying.
---------
Spidrift
"Brevior vita est quam pro futumentibus negotium agendo."
-- Motto of Hogshead Publishing of fond memory, and wise words to set your Foes List by.
Avatar misappropriated from the wonderful XKCD.

User avatar
brasca
Posts: 3848
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:04 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by brasca »

Well if Pandora can be believed Teddi has a good mish mash going. All of the powers with none of the side effects.

User avatar
Milnoc
Posts: 3348
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 6:05 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by Milnoc »

I wonder how big is Pandora's NAS drive? :P

User avatar
Sk'thloq
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 6:36 am
Location: Your nightmares

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by Sk'thloq »

Aaaaaaaaand I'm masturbating. =p~
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Sk'thloq R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

:ymhug: HUGS! :ymhug:

Dr. Jamming
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:50 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by Dr. Jamming »

Spidrift wrote:Somebody's running a shower head fixation at the moment.

Anyhow... I don't mind the censor suds or the SFW limitations, but I have to say that the art is using them a bit heavy-handedly here. If you can't show Teddi's nipples, fine - put Pandora's hands in the way, or just position the frame border for effect. Magic soap bubbles that act like a gag from an Austin Powers movie, except without the funny, are just silly and immersion-destroying.
Your mileage may vary, but I find the censor bubbles to be a fine compromise, and have no trouble accepting them as a convention. It keeps as much as possible of the art while keeping it SFW.

TtheLurker
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 6:10 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by TtheLurker »

Dr. Jamming wrote:
Spidrift wrote:Somebody's running a shower head fixation at the moment.
If you can't show Teddi's nipples, fine - put Pandora's hands in the way
Your mileage may vary, but I find the censor bubbles to be a fine compromise, and have no trouble accepting them as a convention. It keeps as much as possible of the art while keeping it SFW.
I have to agree with Spidrift and cast my vote in favour of having Pandora's hands cover Teddi's nipples (for reasons that have nothing to do with censorship)

BlairFan
Yap Yap Sycophant
Posts: 7788
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by BlairFan »

Pandora will become a mad scientist, creating all kinds of hybrid creatures. ;)

Dr. Jamming
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:50 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 2-01-17 You are a Mish Mash

Post by Dr. Jamming »

TtheLurker wrote:
Dr. Jamming wrote:
Spidrift wrote:Somebody's running a shower head fixation at the moment.
If you can't show Teddi's nipples, fine - put Pandora's hands in the way
Your mileage may vary, but I find the censor bubbles to be a fine compromise, and have no trouble accepting them as a convention. It keeps as much as possible of the art while keeping it SFW.
I have to agree with Spidrift and cast my vote in favour of having Pandora's hands cover Teddi's nipples (for reasons that have nothing to do with censorship)
Well, the hands-on approach would be splendid to be sure. I was more disagreeing with the idea of cropping them out of the frame, which would be a travesty.

Post Reply