The theory has been tested, and proven wrong. There is no infinite veto power being given to anyone claiming they are offended.someone wrote:Let's test this theory.FuzzyFace wrote:That gives infinite veto power to anyone who declares themself offended. That's simply not reasonable.
Dave, I am offended that this comic did not sing the praise of the HypnoToad. In my religion all comics uploaded on a triple-number day (such as January 11 or February 22 or March 33, wait, not that last one) must contain a paragraph about the glory of the hypnotoad.
Please remedy this grave offense immediately.
They're privileged in that they are not discriminated against because of their race, sex, or sexuality.Varanus wrote:That implies that being a straight white male automatically makes one "privileged" when it doesn't. There are plenty of straight white men in identical economic and social positions as the "underprivileged" of other races. To claim otherwise is a gross generalization. It's almost as illogical as claiming that only whites can be racist.
This means that "privilege" is a very bad word, because "not being discriminated against" shouldn't be a privilege. It makes about as much sense as being given the privilege of not getting beaten up by bullies every day; the absence of a bad thing isn't the presence of a good thing.
Anyway, yes, there are people in the so-called privileged demographic who are poor and miserable. Progressive politics have completely abandoned the concept of class warfare, however, so defending the paupers (regardless of race, sex, religion, etc.) is not on anyone's agenda. Reducing the inequalities between men and women, between straight and gay, between cis and trans, those issues are current (and they are perfectly legitimate), but reducing the inequalities between poor and wealthy is no longer a plank in anybody's program. It helps that this issue has been delegitimized by conservative media railing constantly against welfare by calling taxes unjust and a burden on "job creators" while at the same time complaining about "entitlement", thereby making wealth redistribution look bad.