Moderators: Don Alexander, Giz, midgetshrimp, Dave Zero1, Cassandra
Aquila89 wrote:It's really nice how a conversation about linguistics overlaps with a debate about strap-ons.

Don Alexander wrote:...cleavage hammerspace is always a given!!
Don Alexander wrote:Also, I thoroughly approve of massages and hawt threesomes with Ash. Moral schmoral, I'm selling out.
Gargravarr wrote:Don't trust her, Tiff! She's got her hands on your shoulders from behind!
Thor wrote:Why is everyone talking about a strip that won't come out until March 20, 2030?

Count de Money wrote:Faith just has all the answers, doesn't she?
If Tiff's resolve fails, it will be in spite of all the bullshit Faith is giving her, not because of it.
vampire hunter D wrote:Anyone else notice Faith kinda pulled a Yuki there? She went right from"I'd like to be your girlfriend" right to "I am your girlfriend" without any of the necessary intervening stages, like Tiff actually agreeing.


Artemisia wrote:Wait...are we reenacting Ma3 here with ballistic cats?
Artemisia wrote:Better to get her to feed misinformation. It is how I would operate.


TazTheTerrible wrote:Artemisia wrote:Better to get her to feed misinformation. It is how I would operate.
Mmmhm, that's cause you are a schemer.
If it was me personally. I'd try diplomacy.
Despite how most people seem to interpret her character, Faith seems fairly instinctively moral. It's just that she has a really bad concept of morality. Because the only person who ever seems to tell Faith her actions are out of line on actual ethical grounds is Tiff, and even she never seems to try and explain why. I think Faith might be a lot more amnable to reason that most people give her credit for.
I personally dislike the notion of "engineering someone's fall".
Return to Eerie Cuties / Magick Chicks / Dangerously Chloe
Users browsing this forum: CFT, MrsKytro, vampire hunter D and 5 guests