Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Discuss EC/MC/DC here!

Moderators: Dave Zero1, Don Alexander, Giz, midgetshrimp, Cassandra

Gotoh
Posts: 3497
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:18 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by Gotoh » Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:48 pm

brasca wrote:Callista is more of an individual than Sandi, but she willingly subordinates herself to Faith so I think lackey is an appropriate term.
The only two who fit the description are Sandi and Laura (whom the cast page states is Cess' "hapless sidekick"). Sandi was practically glued to Faith's hip and at her beck and call.

Whereas Callista was often shown to be an individual, be at the archery range, or while she was dating Cerise. We hardly ever saw her and Faith together, which I found odd since they're said to be bffs.

User avatar
edisnooM
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:24 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by edisnooM » Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:08 am

So this strip brought to mind three things:

1.) Gabby and Tandy seem to be somewhat knowledgeable about demonic pacts etc., so I'm curious if they might know or be able to find a way to break out of one, possibly with the actual intent of stopping the current goings on, especially if they think the current situation was the deal.

2.) With them now investigating the cause of the current effects (and most likely a countermeasure), I wonder if their investigation or whatever they come up with will have a possible side effect of undoing the transformation.

And 3.) I went back to refresh my memory and Chloe said that in order to wiggle out of the pact the girl needed to feel the connection in her heart, and I'm wondering if any of this possibly fits the bill, or if the artificial nature rules it out.

GKNolan
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:12 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by GKNolan » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:30 am

1) Maybe, but I'm sure their area of expertise is breaking pact-makers, not pacts.
2) Not impossible, I'm sure there's some narrative gymnastics that can lead to that goal.
3) Which raises a question; so long as Teddy only has eyes for Chloe, can the pact be even be broken (like that).

Quote removed. The DAMNed

User avatar
edisnooM
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:24 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by edisnooM » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:58 am

Yeah number 3 was one reason Gabby and Tandy possibly coming up with a third way out occurred to me as a potential loop hole. Though, if those currently under the influence did qualify would all Teddy have to do is ask "Will you be my girlfriend?" Chloe never specified Teddy had to have a connection, and it would "technically" be true.

For that matter, given the innately tricky legalese nature of "deals with the devil" in most stories, would simply having a friend who is a girl also qualify? It would be kind of funny if all this time they were completely overthinking the way out.

Quote removed. The DAMNed

User avatar
Cortez
Posts: 1818
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:53 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by Cortez » Tue Mar 21, 2017 6:22 am

Though they don't know what Teddy asked for in the pack. Not yet.

User avatar
Osaru Sensei
Posts: 367
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 5:07 pm
Location: Sweden, Europe, Earth, Sol System, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster
Contact:

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by Osaru Sensei » Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:14 am

brasca wrote:Callista.
Gimme.
Spidrift wrote:
Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:16 pm
She is indeed a wonderful artist who could doubtless turn her hand to anything, but from what I've seen, I don't get the feeling that she's very interested in depicting some of those bits in all their wrinkly Lovecraftian glory.
Wanna chat with me in realtime? Click my webpage button. In case I happen to be online, anyways...
He who sees his own doom can better avoid its path. He who sees the doom of others can deliver it.
The very moment I understood Callie was my fav character.
High Priestess in the Church of Brasca

User avatar
wiseguy
Posts: 4029
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 7:34 am
Location: California

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by wiseguy » Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:00 pm

Insectoid wrote:@Cortez: Well, she already had an opportunity to...

mmmmmmmm

I think we got the jackpot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


the guys might have "slapped him and maybe use towels on him as slings" and they see it as "pounding him" but if Teddi sees what the 4 girls did to him as "first time someone hit me" and not think about this slap...............................? that could explain it the difference of opinions about whether the guys were lying or not??
ImageImage

User avatar
Cortez
Posts: 1818
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:53 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by Cortez » Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:44 pm

The girls were punching and kicking him though. It also did kick in his defensive pheromones.

Plus Teddy's exact words were that "the boys never hit me".

Gotoh
Posts: 3497
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:18 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by Gotoh » Wed Mar 22, 2017 2:26 am

@Cortez: Which we know to be incorrect, because according to Dave01, they did hit him (but not in the face).

User avatar
brasca
Posts: 2938
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:04 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by brasca » Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:25 pm

Yes it would seem that the boys operate under the same rules of Anchormen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipsPgNEmAXI

User avatar
Cortez
Posts: 1818
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:53 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by Cortez » Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:24 am

Gotoh wrote:@Cortez: Which we know to be incorrect, because according to Dave01, they did hit him (but not in the face).

That would still prove you wrong when you claimed the boys were worse. Even Dave said the girls went further than the guys.

Gotoh
Posts: 3497
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:18 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by Gotoh » Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:27 am

@Cortez: I never said the boys were worse, I said they must've hit him, otherwise, that jock was misusing the word "pounding".

On that note, I'm curious what Teddi considers "hitting" since he claims they never did. Yet, we have confirmation to the contrary.

User avatar
Cortez
Posts: 1818
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:53 am

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by Cortez » Sat Mar 25, 2017 2:20 am


Gotoh
Posts: 3497
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:18 pm

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by Gotoh » Sat Mar 25, 2017 8:34 am

Cortez wrote:You did actually.
Look at what I wrote again.

Teddi (not me) said he had taken worse from other bullies. Then said he had never been hit before, despite what he said previously and despite those jocks plainly saying they pounded him. Which is why I said their statements were contradictory.

User avatar
Don Alexander
Dr. Ebil SithMod
Posts: 27522
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:26 am
Location: Under the arms of the ancient oak, where daylight hangs by a lunar noose...

Re: Dangerously Chloe 20-03-17 Under Her Thrall

Post by Don Alexander » Sun May 07, 2017 5:14 pm

Oh, this again... 8-|

Anyway, I'd say these girls need to mosey over to DoesNotPlayWellWithOthers and have themselves some sexbots built. :P
ImageImage
Sithlord of the Sithling and best customer of McLovecraft's Image, in the business of keeping the little Platypus in business
Moderations in GREEN and signed by the DAMNed. I am not anonymous! Also, MODSMACK!! Image
Winner of the... 2010 Kilopost FRANKIE; 2010 Mad March Nom Off; 2010 Joker Cleavage Contest; 2010 Fan-Thing Contest; 2010 Mimic Contest (tied); 2011 Joker Cleavage Contest; 2011 Contest-for-the-next-Contest (tied)

Post Reply